|
Model Number D9-2005MG |
Device Problem
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
Patient Problem
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
|
Event Date 12/12/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There is no information to indicate that a malfunction occurred.Allergic or adverse reactions are known risks of hemodialysis.Instructions include allergic reaction as a potential risk associated with dialysis therapy and also include warnings to monitor for potential allergic reactions.Biocompatibility of the device has been established.Crane c, cunard ra, sweiss n, scanlon n, doherty ta, potok oa, anaphylaxis from ethylene oxide¿sterilized dialysis tubing and needles: a case report, american journal of kidney diseases (2023), doi: https://doi.Org/10.1053/j.Ajkd.2022.12.004.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received on 25 jan 2023 from a medical doctor (md) via a literature review regarding a 78-year-old male patient with end stage renal disease, chronic eosinophilia, and recent (10 days) transition from use of a tunneled dialysis catheter (tdc) to use of an arteriovenous fistula (avf), who became increasingly symptomatic while performing hemodialysis sessions with the dialysis tubing and needles.The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit for monitoring on an unspecified date.Additional analysis of the event by the md and involved medical team presented a differential diagnosis of anaphylaxis attributed to ethylene oxide (eto2) and its use in sterilization of the involved dialysis tubing and needles.Per the md, the patient¿s increased exposure to eto2 following transition to use of his avf activated an underlying sensitivity and the ensuing immune response.Following the diagnosis, the patient was pre-medicated prior to dialysis sessions with varied oral doses of antihistamines and corticosteroids and tolerated hemodialysis therapy using the tdc.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|