|
Model Number 3241 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/18/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that device was difficult to removed.The 90% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and severely calcified lesion left circumflex artery.A second lesion was located in left anterior descending artery.During preparation, resistance was felt while loading the rotablator rotalink plus 1.50mm onto the rotawire.The left circumflex artery lesion was successfully ablated, but while removing the rotablator rotalink plus 1.50mm resistance was felt.The radiopaque tip of the rotawire became separated inside the patient and was not retrieved.The left anterior descending artery lesion was treated with an additional rotablator rotalink plus 1.50mm and rotawire.The procedure was completed successfully and the patient is doing well.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A rotablator rotalink plus atherectomy device was returned for analysis.The burr catheter was received attached to the advancer unit.The advancer, handshake connections, sheath, coil, burr and annulus were visually and microscopically examined.Inspection of the device found that the annulus of the burr was damaged/not rounded.As the rotawire used in the procedure was not returned, analysis was performed using a test rotawire.During testing, the rotawire was unable to be inserted beyond the damaged annulus of the burr.Further functional testing was performed by attempting to rotate the drive shaft, and the drive shaft was able to be rotated.When the rotablator advancer was connected to the rotablator console control system and the foot pedal was pressed, the device was able to reach and maintain optimal rpm with no resistance or issues.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that removal difficulty occurred.The 90% stenosed, severely tortuous and severely calcified lesion was located in the left circumflex artery.A second lesion was located in left anterior descending artery.During preparation, resistance was felt while loading the rotablator rotalink plus 1.50mm onto the rotawire.The left circumflex artery lesion was successfully ablated, but while removing the rotablator rotalink plus 1.50mm resistance was felt.The radiopaque tip of the rotawire became separated inside the patient and was not retrieved.The left anterior descending artery lesion was treated with an additional rotablator rotalink plus 1.50mm and rotawire.The procedure was completed successfully and the patient is doing well.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|