• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION AQUABEAM ROBOTIC SYSTEM; FLUID JET REMOVAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION AQUABEAM ROBOTIC SYSTEM; FLUID JET REMOVAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number AB2000
Device Problems Visual Prompts will not Clear (2281); Connection Problem (2900); Incomplete or Inadequate Connection (4037)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/10/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A male patient underwent an aquablation procedure for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph).Procept biorobotics corporation (procept) became aware that during the aquablation procedure, the aquabeam handpiece was unable to be engaged to the aquabeam motorpack, and an "e31 - motorpack error" message was generated by the aquabeam robotic system.The handpiece was replaced with a new handpiece unit; however, no proper connection was possible and an "e23 - motorpack error" was generated as well and could not be resolved despite multiple troubleshooting attempts being made.As a result, the aquablation procedure was aborted.There were no adverse health consequences to the patient due to this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Adverse event problem component code 4756: per the instructions for use, the aquabeam motorpack, a re-usable component of the aquabeam robotic system, provides power to the aquabeam handpiece by means of dc motors.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.10 additional manufacturer narrative: additional information not previously provided under in the initial report did not indicate that the aquablation procedure was converted to turp.H.3 evaluation by manufacturer: the aquabeam motorpack was not returned for investigation of the reported event.Visual inspection revealed no physical damage.However, it was observed that saline(fluid ingress) had made its way onto the socket that connects the handpiece connector board, causing a short in the system and triggering the e22 error code.The motorpack was tested with the associated handpieces used during the aquablation procedure.Upon docking the handpiece, an immediate e22 error code was triggered.Attempts were made to clear the error code, but they proved unsuccessful, as subsequent dockings also triggered the e22 error code.In addition, log files confirmed e23, e31, and e43 errors.A review of the device history record (dhr) for aquabeam robotic system/serial number (b)(6) and the aquabeam motorpack / lot number 19c01083 was performed, which confirmed that there were no nonconformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the system and its associated component met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.The current user manual um0104-00 rev.F, aquabeam robotic system user manual was reviewed.Section 11.2.7 sterile: motorpack draping and docking with the aquabeam handpiece contains the note to, "verify the motorpack is securely engaged to the aquabeam handpiece by attempting to pull the aquabeam handpiece off of the motorpack.The aquabeam handpiece should remain connected to the motorpack if properly engaged." dock the motorpack to the aquabeam handpiece: - verify aquabeam handpiece nozzle position (i.E.The movement of the blue led) homes to the base of the aquabeamhandpiece (fully proximal).- apply sterile tape over the connection between aquabeam handpiece and motorpack to seal it.- keep the motorpack and the aquabeam handpiece assembly with the scope clamp assembly in a secure and sterile environment.Although the in-house investigation confirmed the reported failure mode, the root cause was unable to be established.Complaint data is monitored and trended as part of procept's quality management system; shall a trend arise for this failure mode, then further actions will be considered.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The aquabeam motorpack was returned for investigation of the reported event.Visual inspection revealed no physical damage.Functional investigation confirmed that fluid ingress made its way onto an electrical component, causing a short in the system and subsequently triggering the reported e22 error code.The reported event was further confirmed during functional testing when the motorpack was tested with its associated handpieces used during the aquablation procedure.In addition, log files confirmed e23, e31, and e43 errors.A review of the device history record (dhr) for aquabeam robotic system/serial number (b)(6) and the aquabeam motorpack / lot number 19c01083 was performed, which confirmed that there were no nonconformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the system and its associated component met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.The current user manual um0104-00 rev.F, aquabeam robotic system user manual was reviewed.Section 11.2.7 sterile: motorpack draping and docking with the aquabeam handpiece contains the note to, "verify the motorpack is securely engaged to the aquabeam handpiece by attempting to pull the aquabeam handpiece off of the motorpack.The aquabeam handpiece should remain connected to the motorpack if properly engaged." dock the motorpack to the aquabeam handpiece: verify aquabeam handpiece nozzle position (i.E.The movement of the blue led) homes to the base of the aquabeamhandpiece (fully proximal).Apply sterile tape over the connection between aquabeam handpiece and motorpack to seal it.Keep the motorpack and the aquabeam handpiece assembly with the scope clamp assembly in a secure and sterile environment.Although the in-house investigation confirmed the reported failure mode, the root cause was unable to be established.Complaint data is monitored and trended as part of procept's quality management system; shall a trend arise for this failure mode, then further actions will be considered.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AQUABEAM ROBOTIC SYSTEM
Type of Device
FLUID JET REMOVAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION
900 island drive
suite 101
redwood city CA 94065 1494
Manufacturer (Section G)
PROCEPT BIOROBOTICS CORPORATION
900 island drive
suite 101
redwood city CA 94065 1494
Manufacturer Contact
doria esquivel
900 island drive
suite 101
redwood city, CA 94065-1494
MDR Report Key16326507
MDR Text Key309090876
Report Number3012977056-2023-00017
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PZP
UDI-Device IdentifierB614AB20001
UDI-Public+B614AB20001/16D20190924S
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
DEN170024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAB2000
Device Catalogue NumberAB2000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/25/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/10/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/08/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/06/2023
05/03/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/28/2023
05/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/24/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-