• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. LVIS EVO; INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. LVIS EVO; INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number LEV2527-MVE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Speech Disorder (4415); Ischemia Stroke (4418); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 01/23/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported through the sealant clinical study, the patient was treated for a 6.5 x 4.7 x 3.4 saccular bifurcation aneurysm, located on the left middle cerebral artery (mca).The aneurysm never ruptured and was not previously treated.During the embolization and due to high friction inside catheter, the first lvis evo stent attempted was not implanted and was removed without problems.A second lvis evo was exchanged and successfully implanted together with a web sl intrasaccular device and an hydrosoft coil by jailed-catheter technique.At the end of the procedure, the parent artery remained without stenosis.The patient was discharged from the hospital with a neurological evaluation mrs score 0.Reportedly, 7 months post embolization procedure, in stent stenosis developed at superior trunk and the patient experienced ischemic stroke with a nihss score 0, located in the ipsilateral side.The outcome described as "not resolved/ongoing." patient is scheduled for a mri and angiography follow-up exam in two months.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device remains implanted in the patient and not available for return; however, procedure images were provided and their review is not complete.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies neurologic insufficiencies including stroke as a potential complication associated with use of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual analysis: a visual inspection of the device captured in this file could not be performed as a physical device was not returned for evaluation.Investigation findings: without the return and physical evaluation of the device, the investigation cannot definitively determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.Based on a review of the device¿s risk documentation, the reported event did not indicate there were any potential or new manufacturing, design, quality, or other systemic issues, or non-conformances.The complaint code is monitored through the trending process; corrective action is determined, as needed, through this process.Investigations of historic complaint files with similar complaint category coding are recorded in the complaint handling system; without the ability to perform and analysis of the device, this investigation cannot identify with certainty any potential root causes.Batch review: a search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.Complaint system review: there are no similar complaints based on the complaint category regarding this batch number from the last two years recorded in the complaint system at the time of this investigation.Ifu review (additional information can be found in the ifu, following is taken from the english version): potential complications: possible complications include but are not limited to the following: hematoma at the puncture site, perforation or dissection of the vessel(s), intravascular spasm, hemorrhaging, rupture or perforation of aneurysm, coil herniation, device migration, neurologic insufficiencies including stroke and death, ischemia, vascular occlusion, vessel stenosis, incomplete aneurysm occlusion, pseudoaneurysm formation, distal embolization, headache, infection, reaction to contrast agents including severe allergic reactions and renal failure.Imaging review: two sets of dicom images were provided.The first set was obtained on the day of the procedure.Multiple flat plate cts show an lvis evo spanning from the superior division of the left m2 to the proximal left m1.A 3d dsa demonstrates an approximately 6 mm mca bifurcation aneurysm containing a web and a coil; an lvis evo spans from the proximal m1 to the superior division of the left m2.The resolution is such that i cannot comment on the presence or absence of stenosis.The m1 and m2 are patent.There are no procedural images.The second set was obtained on the follow-up examination on the event date.There are dsas of the left ica in ap, lateral, and one oblique projection.The aneurysm is completely occluded.The superior m2 division of the left mca where the lvis evo is located is severely diffusely narrowed.There is a severe stenosis at the origin of the inferior left mca m2 division.A 3d dsa shows the same.These images do not explain the friction problem the operator experienced with the lvis evo, nor the stenosis that are observed on the 6-month follow-up.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LVIS EVO
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL COIL-ASSIST STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key16354849
MDR Text Key309307087
Report Number2032493-2023-00563
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QCA
UDI-Device Identifier00842429103456
UDI-Public(01)00842429103456(11)201123(17)231031(10)20112354Y
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P170013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2023
Device Model NumberLEV2527-MVE
Device Lot Number20112354Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/26/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/10/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/16/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/23/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-