Edwards received notification of a pascal precision procedure in mitral position.An air-related event occurred.After inserting the guide sheath (gs) into the left atrium (la) and retraction of the dilator, air bubbles were observed coming from the gs, into the la.The bubbles formed an echogenic structure close to the aorta.The physician steered the guide to the bubbles and aspirated the air into the guide.Ew guide sheath was used to aspirate the bubble.Post procedure it was noted that the patient required more time than usual to wake up.There were no signs of cerebral damage after finally waking.There was no further sequalae and the patient was released from the hospital.As per the doctor opinion, the "slow to wake up" was a consequence of air embolism into cerebral vasculature.After image evaluation, there appeared to be a 15mm x 7mm bright echogenic structure in the left atrium, near the ascending aorta during the procedural tee.The pascal device appears to be in stable position and final residual mr is qualitatively trace.
|
The complaint for device not completely de-aired during flushing and preparation, air remaining in the device was confirmed with empirical evidence.The event description was reported to a clinical specialist from a physician/hospital staff.Because edwards personnel were present for the procedure, the device was not returned, and air was not conclusively visualized in the imaging evaluation, the complaint can only be confirmed with empirical evidence.No device was returned for physical evaluation for non-conformances.However, a dhr review of the lot in question revealed no non-conformances.Representative units were used in testing both for the air introduction test procedure (quantitative data results) and eva testing (qualitative results).Air introduction testing showed that air introduced by the system was within the range qualified per design verification testing.Eva testing demonstrated that the event description was unable to be recreated.Because the device was not returned, it could not be evaluated for non-conformances.Potential root causes for the presence of air may include: omission of a flushing/de-airing step improper stopcock/syringe technique device-related defect that could not be confirmed due to complaint units being discarded.However, a true root cause is unable to be determined.
|