• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS PIC IX HARDWARE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS PIC IX HARDWARE Back to Search Results
Model Number 866424
Device Problems Defective Alarm (1014); Unintended Electrical Shock (4018)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/24/2023
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
The customer reported the patient was shocked by a bedside monitor.The patient died.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A follow up report will be submitted after philips obtains more information concerning this event.Reporter phone #: (b)(6).Reporting address state: (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The customer reported the device alarmed with yellow alarm instead of an expected red alarm.There was no patient harm reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The field service engineer went on customer site to collect the audit log files.The following functional tests were performed: ¿ logs from the pic ix were obtained.¿ logs have been analyzed by the pse.Results of functional testing indicate there is no malfunction on the pic ix.The audit logs showed there was a red alarm generated for vent fib/tach at 01:36:12 on both the mamh03sp05ipcu and mamhllop06tele hosts (in blue and red).The red alarm kept ringing on host mamh03sp05ipcu until 01:45:55 where it ended.The yellow alarm was generated for the pvc until it was ended at 01:46:37.Overall, there was a red alarm that was sounded until 01:45:55 and then it was turned off, then the yellow alarm went on.After it was turned off (could either have been silenced or that the vtach then did not fit the criteria of having the alarm go red), the user likely saw that yellow alarm relating to the pvc on that host 05ipcu host.The next red alarm occurred on (b)(6), 2023, and 05:01:01 over 3 hours later.Unless there is a reason why this patient should have been red alarmed between 01:45:55 and 05:01:01, the pse does not see any problems with the alarms.Based on the information available and the testing conducted, the device was functioning as intended and there is no malfunction on the device the device was confirmed to be operating per specifications and no failure was identified.
 
Event Description
Philips received a complaint on the pic ix hardware questioning whether a yellow alarm should have been a red alarm.The device was in use on a patient.There was no report of patient or user harm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIC IX HARDWARE
Type of Device
PIC IX HARDWARE
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman rd
b1-3/d6
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman rd
b1-3/d6
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
hisham alzayat
3000 minuteman rd
b1-3/d6
andover, MA 01810
6172455900
MDR Report Key16377826
MDR Text Key309550964
Report Number9610816-2023-00078
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
UNKNOWN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number866424
Device Catalogue Number866424
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/27/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/15/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/08/2023
03/21/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/27/2023
04/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-