• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC PHOTODYNAMIC BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEM; IN VIVO INTRAMEDUILLARY FIXATION ROD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC PHOTODYNAMIC BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEM; IN VIVO INTRAMEDUILLARY FIXATION ROD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SY-2000-01
Device Problems Defective Device (2588); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/20/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
At the time of this initial mdr report, the investigation into the cause of the event is still ongoing.The firm received the returned device from the distributor, and is performing device evaluation in order to complete the complaint investigation.A follow up mdr will be submitted when further information is known about this case.
 
Event Description
An illuminoss distributor reported that during a procedure, the light box foot pedal would not activate the light box.An alternative method to activate the light box was used.The light box functioned correctly, the procedure was completed, and the patient outcome was good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
At the time of the initial mdr submission for this event, the investigation into the cause of this event was still underway.This followup mdr is submitted to submit new information, including the device manufacture date.An update on the progress of the on-going investigation and product evaluation activities the firm is performing.At the time of this followup 1 mdr report, the investigation into the cause of the event is still ongoing.The firm reviewed the manufacturing records for the device, and found the device met specification at the time of manufacture and release.The firm received the returned device from the distributor, and began 3 rounds of product evaluation to replicate the failure mode reported.Round 1: in house product evaluation on the returned device was performed on 17feb2023.These preliminary results could not replicate the reported failure mode (the foot petal activated the light box).The firm interviewed the distributor who reported this event, to get more information.Through these interviews, the firm clarified the sequence of events as experienced by this distributor.Round 2: in house product evaluation was performed again on the returned device, to attempt to replicate the failure mode based on the clarified sequence of events experienced by the distributor.These preliminary results could not replicate the reported failure mode (the foot petal activated the light box).Round 3: the device was sent to the firm's device contract manufacturer for additional product evaluation, to attempt to replicate the failure mode, and perform a complete diagnostic of the device.The contract manufacturer provided the firm with its initial analysis on (b)(6) 2023, which included that the device failure mode has not yet been able to be replicated.The contract manufacturer will therefore perform a final round of additional testing to verify if this reported failure mode can be observed.A follow up mdr will be submitted when further information is known about this case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
At the time of the previous mdr submissions for this event, the investigation into the cause of this event was still underway.This followup mdr is to submit new information, including the results of the firm's product evaluation and root cause investigation.The firm received the returned device from the distributor, and performed 3 rounds of product evaluation to replicate the failure mode reported.Round 1: in house product evaluation on the returned device was performed on (b)(6) 2023.These preliminary results could not replicate the reported failure mode (the foot petal activated the light box).The firm interviewed the distributor who reported this event, to get more information.Through these interviews, the firm clarified the sequence of events as experienced by this distributor.Round 2: in house product evaluation was performed again on the returned device, to attempt to replicate the failure mode based on the clarified sequence of events experienced by the distributor.These preliminary results could not replicate the reported failure mode (the foot petal activated the light box).Round 3: the device was sent to the firm's contract manufacturer for additional product evaluation, to attempt to replicate the failure mode.The contract manufacturer provided the firm with its analysis and results, which concluded that the device failure mode has not been able to be replicated.The contract manufacturer performed a complete diagnostic of the device, and found that the unit passed all inspection testing, and functioned as normal.The firm on the basis of this evidence therefore concludes that there is nothing faulty with the unit.Review of ifu the instructions for use includes instructions to connect the foot pedal to rear of the light source console with an illustration of the back of the light box and arrow pointing to the foot pedal tubing insertion point., and also to operate the light source console by depressing the foot pedal.Potential sources of user error which could have led to this complaint include failure to plug the foot pedal tubing into the light box, or failure to depress the foot pedal to activate the light source.Followup interviews with the distributor who was present for this case do not indicate that these possible user errors were experienced in this case.The distributor is experienced with the illuminoss system and the light box, and described the correct user of the device when describing this case.Conclusion the root cause of this issue could not be definitely identified with the information available to the firm.Product evaluation found the device performs as intended, and the reported issue could not be replicated, either by the firm or the firm's contract manufacturer for the device.Although possible causes of this issue could have been user error, there is no evidence to suggest that user error occurred in this case.Therefore the cause is undetermined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PHOTODYNAMIC BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEM
Type of Device
IN VIVO INTRAMEDUILLARY FIXATION ROD
Manufacturer (Section D)
ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC
993 waterman ave
east providence RI 02914
Manufacturer (Section G)
ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC
993 waterman ave
east providence RI 02914
Manufacturer Contact
robert rabiner
993 waterman ave
east providence, RI 02914
4017140008
MDR Report Key16402257
MDR Text Key310001464
Report Number3006845464-2023-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K181228
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSY-2000-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/26/2023
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/20/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/20/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/20/2023
01/20/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/12/2023
05/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/31/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age36 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-