This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated/corrected updated: g3; h2; h3; h6 visual examination of the returned product identified it is confirmed that the thread is fractured and partly missing.The part also shows wear and damage.Additionally, the device was submitted for further analysis.Analysis determined the fracture revealed river lines artifacts all flowing in one direction towards a suspected hinge at its edge, suggesting a bending overload mode of fracture.Medical records were provided and reviewed by a health care professional.Review of the available records identified the following: multiple attempts made to explant the stem with a backslap hammer and osteotomes, stem well fixed and unable to be removed, surgeon elected to leave the stem rather than eto.At this point, the back slapping attachments broke off in the stem with only the threads being full of the metal of the extraction device and no prominent portion of the back slapper to be grasped in order to be removed.Review of the device history record(s) identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|