Model Number 101-9812 |
Device Problems
Material Integrity Problem (2978); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/20/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression spacer implant procedure, the physician attempted the sagittal wiggle applications after which the spindle cap eventually broke.It was assessed that the implant was not properly connected to the inserter and the physician did not deploy the implant enough to reposition the implant above the lamina.The broken implant was removed from the patient and a different spacer of the same size was used to complete the procedure successfully with no patient complications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an indirect decompression spacer implant procedure, the physician attempted the sagittal wiggle applications after which the spindle cap eventually broke.It was assessed that the implant was not properly connected to the inserter and the physician did not deploy the implant enough to reposition the implant above the lamina.The broken implant was removed from the patient and a different spacer of the same size was used to complete the procedure successfully with no patient complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device analysis performed on the returned indirect decompression spacer revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.Damage to the device prevented functional testing.However, this damage to the spacer indicates the break was due to deployment against resistance, such as bone, and/or manipulation of the position of the device by shifting the inserter.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label.Additionally, device breakage can occur when used with forced deployment and is noted within the ifu as a potential complication associated with use of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|