• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN EXETER STEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN EXETER STEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SHC
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Reaction to Medicinal Component of Device (4574)
Event Date 01/30/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This pi is for the patient's right hip.In providing information for revision of the patient's left hip for pain, stiffness, resorption and loosening (surgeon suspects this is due to patient reaction/ rejection to cement), office visit note states "the mri and her plain images demonstrate that she is developing a similar disease process involving her right hip but not as severe." surgeon reported he plans to revise the patient's right hip (date not reported).Rep confirmed an exeter stem is in situ, and that no additional information will be released by the hospital or surgeon until that hip is revised.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding loosening involving an unknown exeter stem (right hip) was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: : a patient had increasing pain and disfunction approximately 3 years after a cemented hybrid tha with an exeter stem and trident psl cup.An mri showed bone resorption and loosening of the stem.A revision surgery was proposed.More subtle but similar finding were noted on the right.A revision was felt to be likely on the right as well.The surgeon hypothesized that the patient may be reacting to the cement pr perhaps have an allergy.Event confirmation: a left hip revision surgery event cannot be confirmed.Bone loss and likely loosening around a 3 year old left hip exeter stem can be confirmed.Allergy or adverse reaction to bone cement cannot be confirmed.Mri changes only can be confirmed on the right side.Root cause: a root cause cannot be ascertained from the records provided for review.-product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.-complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: : a patient had increasing pain and disfunction approximately 3 years after a cemented hybrid tha with an exeter stem and trident psl cup.An mri showed bone resorption and loosening of the stem.A revision surgery was proposed.More subtle but similar finding were noted on the right.A revision was felt to be likely on the right as well.The surgeon hypothesized that the patient may be reacting to the cement pr perhaps have an allergy.Event confirmation: a left hip revision surgery event cannot be confirmed.Bone loss and likely loosening around a 3 year old left hip exeter stem can be confirmed.Allergy or adverse reaction to bone cement cannot be confirmed.Mri changes only can be confirmed on the right side.Root cause: a root cause cannot be ascertained from the records provided for review.Further information such as device identification details, return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the primary operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and / or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
This pi is for the patient's right hip.In providing information for revision of the patient's left hip for pain, stiffness, resorption and loosening (surgeon suspects this is due to patient reaction/ rejection to cement), office visit note states "the mri and her plain images demonstrate that she is developing a similar disease process involving her right hip but not as severe." surgeon reported he plans to revise the patient's right hip (date not reported).Rep confirmed an exeter stem is in situ, and that no additional information will be released by the hospital or surgeon until that hip is revised.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN EXETER STEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
joann ripoli
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key16441476
MDR Text Key310228901
Report Number0002249697-2023-00190
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SHC
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/30/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/17/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight68 KG
-
-