• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3MAXCKIT
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/24/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system 3max reperfusion catheter (3maxc), a penumbra engine (engine), a non-penumbra catheter, a non-penumbra sheath, and a guidewire.It should be noted that the patient''s anatomy was tortuous and had arteriosclerosis.During the procedure, the physician completed a direct aspiration first pass (adapt) using the 3maxc and partial recanalization of the target vessel was achieved.When the 3maxc passed through the lesion a second time, resistance was encountered.It was also reported that there was no reverse flow after aspirating the thrombus.While retracting the 3maxc and catheter into the sheath under negative pressure, resistance was encountered.Upon removal, the 3maxc was found fractured and the distal end of the 3maxc remained in the m1 to the internal carotid artery (ica).Next, a snare device was used to retrieve the fractured piece of the 3maxc.On the back table, the physician noted that the distal end of the 3maxc was kinked near the fracture and was likely caused by the snare device.At this point, the procedure was ended.It was also noted that the target vessel was not fully recanalized; however, the patient was followed-up with on a later date.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned 3maxc confirmed that the catheter was fractured and revealed stretching near the fractured location.The complaint stated that resistance was experienced during the procedure.If the 3maxc is retracted against resistance, damage such as stretching and subsequent fracture may occur.Based on the reported event, the patient's tortuous anatomy may have contributed to some resistance experienced during the procedure.Further evaluation revealed an ovalization on the distal fractured segment.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and occurred while snaring of the device.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key16444262
MDR Text Key310270466
Report Number3005168196-2023-00088
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K160449
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,03/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number3MAXCKIT
Device Lot NumberF109407
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/15/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/02/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/15/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/21/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/24/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-