• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM A. COOK AUSTRALIA, PTY LTD ZENITH FENESTRATED AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT PROXIMAL BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM A. COOK AUSTRALIA, PTY LTD ZENITH FENESTRATED AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT PROXIMAL BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ZFEN-P-2-30-124
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Premature Activation (1484); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/10/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Diameter reducing ties appear to have deployed during initial unsheathing of device.Device had wall contact and was not able to be repositioned.
 
Event Description
Diameter reducing ties appear to have deployed during initial unsheathing of device.Device had wall contact and was not able to be repositioned.On 22/2/23 received reply from the representative: updated on 15tgh march 23.Question: has the physician determined possible contributing factors that may have contributed to the reported event? - dr has not confirmed yet.Question: was the device ifu followed? if yes, has the device functioned as expected while following the ifu? if no, please provide details.Yes - device deployed as per ifu.Question: was any difficulty experienced during deployment? if yes, please provide details.- yes - the graft appeared to have wall contact, however diameter reducing ties were not deployed yet.No difficulty with unsheathing.Question: was the patient¿s anatomy tortuous? no.Question: are any ¿procedural notes¿ available? if so, please provide.Dr has not confirmed yet.Question: was the device inspected prior to use in order to ensure no damage has occurred? yes.Question: was there any difficulty positioning graft? - yes - the graft appeared to have wall contact, however diameter reducing ties were not deployed yet.Question: was there any difficulty withdrawing trigger wires? no.Question: was the delivery system rotated together as per the ifu? yes.
 
Event Description
Diameter reducing ties appear to have deployed during initial unsheathing of device.Device had wall contact and was not able to be repositioned.On 22/2/23 received reply from the representative: updated on 15th march 23.Question: has the physician determined possible contributing factors that may have contributed to the reported event? - dr has not confirmed yet.Question: was the device ifu followed? if yes, has the device functioned as expected while following the ifu? if no, please provide details.Yes - device deployed as per ifu question: was any difficulty experienced during deployment? if yes, please provide details.- yes - the graft appeared to have wall contact, however diameter reducing ties were not deployed yet.No difficulty with unsheathing.Question: was the patient¿s anatomy tortuous? no question: are any ¿procedural notes¿ available? if so, please provide.Dr has not confirmed yet.Question: was the device inspected prior to use in order to ensure no damage has occurred? yes question: was there any difficulty positioning graft? - yes - the graft appeared to have wall contact, however diameter reducing ties were not deployed yet.Question: was there any difficulty withdrawing trigger wires? no question: was the delivery system rotated together as per the ifu? yes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The grafts remain in situ, so the product was not returned for evaluation.Images were provided and reviewed by the medical director.The medical director stated the following: the segment of the aorta just above the renal arteries, forming the neck of the aneurysm, measures about 23mm at its smallest diameter.The diameter mismatch may have caused the problem.The following additional information was received: question: has the physician determined possible contributing factors that may have contributed to the reported event? ¿ dr has not confirmed yet.Question: was the device ifu followed? if yes, has the device functioned as expected while following the ifu? if no, please provide details.Yes - device deployed as per ifu question: was any difficulty experienced during deployment? if yes, please provide details.- yes - the graft appeared to have wall contact, however diameter reducing ties were not deployed yet.No difficulty with unsheathing.Question: was the patient¿s anatomy tortuous? no question: are any ¿procedural notes¿ available? if so, please provide.Dr has not confirmed yet.Question: was the device inspected prior to use in order to ensure no damage has occurred? yes question: was there any difficulty positioning graft? - yes - the graft appeared to have wall contact, however diameter reducing ties were not deployed yet.Question: was there any difficulty withdrawing trigger wires? no question: was the delivery system rotated together as per the ifu? yes a review of device history record for work order (b)(4) was reviewed and appears complete and correct.The device was manufactured to specification and did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to the adverse event.The instruction for use (ifu) supplied with the device states: general information: table 9.5.1 proximal body graft diameter sizing shows that a 23 mm intended aortic vessel diameter should be matched with a 28 mm main body diameter.Based on the information it is likely that the mismatch of graft diameter with the vessel diameter may have contributed to this complaint.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZENITH FENESTRATED AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT PROXIMAL BODY
Type of Device
MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM A. COOK AUSTRALIA, PTY LTD
95 brandl street
eight mile plains
brisbane
AS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM A. COOK AUSTRALIA, PTY LTD
95 brandl street
eight mile plains
brisbane
AS  
Manufacturer Contact
meena harish
95 brandl street
eight mile plains
brisbane 
AS  
MDR Report Key16449045
MDR Text Key310340342
Report Number9680654-2023-00016
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier10827002381602
UDI-Public(01)10827002381602(17)260117(10)AC1126168
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P020018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/10/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberZFEN-P-2-30-124
Device Lot NumberAC1126168
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/14/2023
Initial Date FDA Received02/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/14/2023
02/14/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/15/2023
04/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-