Manufacturer evaluation: the device was returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.A visual examination of the device was performed which revealed that a disassembly of the distal jaw occurred, which caused the jaw to separate from the housing.However, both links were present at tip, and only a single grasper jaw separated.Additionally, the handle function was not smooth, and actuation of the grasper felt resistive and inconsistent.The device history records (dhr) were reviewed for the available serial number; the device was found to be within specification at the time of production.All device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was able to confirm the failure mode of distal jaw separation.In addition to a supplier corrective action request (scar) being initiated, a corrective action/preventive action (capa) was opened by aesculap inc.For further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.
|