• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD. CD5 PE-CY7 CE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD. CD5 PE-CY7 CE Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/01/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that while using the cd5 pe-cy7 ce that there were erroneous reults.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: 2) could you please inform us if samples are available? (customer mentioned: "in stock we have 2 more packs of cd5pecy7 from the same batch").As we said, we have 2 new packs of the same batch.3) was it obvious that the results were erroneous/could not be trusted? yes, because usually we don¿t need to make any change in the compensation matrix.4) is a confirmatory test always performed? we tested another new pack of the same batch that work properly for two weeks then even this one gave some problems in the compensation.It looks like the spillover of the pe-cy7 in the pe channel gradually increases.5) were patient samples involved? we work on primary samples from whole blood of cll patients.We perform an immunophenotype to characterize the cll for both diagnostic and research purposes.6) were erroneous results reported to the clinician? no, clinical markers could be evaluated through compensation.However it was difficult to evaluate the signal in the pe channel, in particular for some markers expressed at low intensity (for research purposes).7) were patients treated based on erroneous results? no.This is to inform you that we have encountered problems in detecting the fluorescence signal in 2 packs of cd5pecy7 cod 348810 lot: 2214258.With the first package, the problem occurred on first use.The second package, in use since 10.01.2023, gave no problems until yesterday but today it was necessary to change the compensation values during the analysis.In stock we have 2 more packs of cd5pecy7 from the same batch.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Initial reporter prefix: (b)(6).A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using the cd5 pe-cy7 ce that there were erroneous results.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: 2) could you please inform us if samples are available? (customer mentioned: "in stock we have 2 more packs of cd5pecy7 from the same batch") as we said, we have 2 new packs of the same batch.3) was it obvious that the results were erroneous/could not be trusted? yes, because usually we don¿t need to make any change in the compensation matrix.4) is a confirmatory test always performed? we tested another new pack of the same batch that work properly for two weeks then even this one gave some problems in the compensation.It looks like the spillover of the pe-cy7 in the pe channel gradually increases.5) were patient samples involved? we work on primary samples from whole blood of cll patients.We perform an immunophenotype to characterize the cll for both diagnostic and research purposes.6) were erroneous results reported to the clinician? no, clinical markers could be evaluated through compensation.However it was difficult to evaluate the signal in the pe channel, in particular for some markers expressed at low intensity (for research purposes).7) were patients treated based on erroneous results? no this is to inform you that we have encountered problems in detecting the fluorescence signal in 2 packs of cd5pecy7 cod 348810 lot.2214258.With the first package, the problem occurred on first use.The second package, in use since (b)(6) 2023, gave no problems until yesterday but today it was necessary to change the compensation values during the analysis.In stock we have 2 more packs of cd5pecy7 from the same batch.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following fields have been updated with corrected information: g.1 - reporting office - becton dickinson and company (b)(6) g.1 - reporting office contact - (b)(6) g.1 - manufacturing site contact - (b)(6) h.6 imdrf annex f code: f26 h.6 investigation summary: based on the investigation results, the reported issue that problems were encountered in detecting the fluorescence signal in 2 packs of cd5pecy7 348810 lot.2214258 that required changing the compensation values during the analysis was was confirmed to be a usage error.Potential causes of the defect include prolonged exposure to paraformaldehyde or light.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.Information will be captured on trend reports and monitored.Our business team regularly reviews the collected data for identification of emerging trends.H3 other text : see h.10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CD5 PE-CY7 CE
Type of Device
NA
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD.
vicks drive
lot no. 6
cayey PR
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD.
vicks drive
lot no. 6
cayey PR
Manufacturer Contact
fahmy razak - mdr
2350 qume drive
san jose, CA 95131
4089542435
MDR Report Key16526776
MDR Text Key311580017
Report Number2647876-2023-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MVU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/27/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date07/31/2023
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN
Device Catalogue Number348810
Device Lot Number2214258
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/09/2023
Initial Date FDA Received03/10/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/27/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/01/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-