• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC13
Device Problems Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883); Pain (1994)
Event Date 01/01/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a linx device was removed and it appeared to be broken in a couple of places.The patient reported he had an mri and experienced chest pain.The patient¿s gerds symptoms came back after the mri.No further details at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/16/2023.Only event year known: 2023.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what was the date of implant? what was the explant date? what is the product code? what is the lot number for the linx device? was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? after implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? when did the recurrent reflux begin? when did the gerds symptoms begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: (b)(4).Was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? what was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/30/2023.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what was the date of implant? what was the explant date? what is the product code? what is the lot number for the linx device? was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? after implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? when did the recurrent reflux begin? when did the gerds symptoms begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? what was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? answer - model# lxmc13.Lot# 9401.Implant date: (b)(6) 2015.Explant date: (b)(6) 2023.Onset of symptoms: (b)(6) 2022 during mri.Mri date: (b)(6) 2022.Mri strength: 1.5 tesla.Patient gender: female.Patient age: 69.Bmi: 22.6.General health: good.Allergies: sulfa, tetracycline, niacin.D1, d4.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation summary: a linx device with two visible weld balls disconnected from a washer and a male bead case was returned to the analysis site.The link length and tensile force measurements were found to meet the applicable specifications during device analysis.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the visible weld balls, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.The device was scanned using computer tomography (ct), optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.Both through-holes at the separation were measured and was greater than the specification.The through-holes were concentric with material displacement at the outer edge of the through holes.The overall appearance of the surface of the washer and male bead case didn't exhibit loss of shape.The washer was observed to be bent outwards with both welds holding in place.The top view of the diameter of the exposed weld balls were measured.This diameter is within the specification.The weld balls were concentric with the respect to the wire.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device (b)(4) number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 13B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview 
3035526892
MDR Report Key16552878
MDR Text Key311393820
Report Number3008766073-2023-00045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005332
UDI-Public00855106005332
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/26/2019
Device Model NumberLXMC13
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC13
Device Lot Number9401
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/03/2023
Initial Date FDA Received03/16/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/20/2023
02/28/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/30/2023
02/28/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/26/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberZ-2038-2018
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-