• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC UNKNOWN POLY; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC UNKNOWN POLY; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_WWA
Device Problem Naturally Worn (2988)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 02/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a total ankle replacement.Allegedly, the patient may need to undergo a revision surgery because the poly has worn down.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a total ankle replacement.Allegedly, the patient may need to undergo a revision surgery because the poly has worn down.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed since the poly was not returned and no assessment could be made on the ct imaging provided.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed, "there is clear radiolucence around the distal tibial component, and there are cavities around the implant.As the surgeon assumes, that the tibial component is in place and intact and the tip of the implant does not show signs of loosening, i assume, that these findings were already present at the time of the insertion of the implant.Therefore i would assess these as not being loosened.And there is no clear sign of migration.The pe is not visible directly in the ct scan, however, the surgeon assumes that there might be some damage (wear) within the pe.Possible, but cannot be confirmed with the imaging only.The talar component is positioned in direct contact to large cavities, which are likely to impair the foundation of the implant.This can be assessed as loosening and the widened distance between the tibia and the talus could be used as a proof for the migration of the component.The talar component is loosened and has migrated." based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient factors related issue.Regarding the allegation of a worn poly, no conclusion can be drawn based on the information provided.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling was not possible because the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN POLY
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key16565277
MDR Text Key311499471
Report Number3010667733-2023-00124
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_WWA
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/20/2023
Initial Date FDA Received03/17/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/09/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-