Device failed to control bleeding [device ineffective].Large clot was hindering the suction of blood [device occlusion].Case narrative: this initial spontaneous report originating from the united states, was received from a nurse educator via jada clinical educator referring to a non-pregnant female patient of unknown age.The patient's historical conditions included caesarean section.The patient's concurrent conditions included hospitalization and post-delivery hemorrhage.Concomitant medications were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On (b)(6) 2023 (reported as yesterday), physician placed vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via vaginal route (lot# and expiration date were not reported) for post-delivery hemorrhage (postpartum hemorrhage).Nurse educator stated device failed to control bleeding (device ineffective).After vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was removed it appeared that a large clot was hindering the suction of blood (device occlusion).The therapy with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was discontinued on same day.The availability of vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was unknown.Medical attention was requested.No additional adverse event (ae) or product quality complaint (pqc) reported.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was considered to be medically significant.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): (4648) there is not yet enough information available to classify the health impact.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): (4641) patient required an unforeseen medical intervention, excluding surgery, which was not on the original treatment plan.
|