|
Model Number LXMC16 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883)
|
Event Date 03/08/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date of event: unknown; captured as awareness date.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what is the product code? what was the exact implant date? what was the explant date? what is the lot number for the linx device? was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? after implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? when did the recurrent reflux begin? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a linx device was implanted two years ago and initially the patient¿s gerd symptoms were mitigated.About 9 months ago, the patient¿s symptoms returned and doctor ordered scans.On the scans there was no hiatal hernia and intraoperatively, he discovered no recurring hiatal hernia.The patient had, however, had 12 mris (1.5t) done since the device was implanted.Doctor removed the linx device and performed a fundoplication.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4); date sent: 4/12/2023.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is the product code? what was the exact implant date? what was the explant date? what is the lot number for the linx device? was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? after implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? when did the recurrent reflux begin? answer - i have tried to get this information, but the account is unwilling to provide any additional information.A 16 bead linx device was received at cg labs, final destination not yet delivered.Lxmc16 was determined to be the product code.D1, d4.D6a: exact implant date is unknown.Device was implanted 2 years ago.Assumed first day of the month and first month of the year.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4); date sent: 5/10/2023.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/23/2023.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|