• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1808060
Device Problems Difficult to Flush (1251); Suction Problem (2170); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 02/28/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that eleven days post port placement, the patient allegedly experienced hematoma, arm pain and fever due to the port.It was further reported that x-ray examination and lab tests were performed which confirmed a potential blood stream infection.The patient was admitted to the hospital; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported as unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failures as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, g3, h6 (device).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that eleven days post port placement, the port allegedly did not function and the patient allegedly experienced hematoma, arm pain and fever due to the port.It was further reported that x-ray examination and lab tests were performed which confirmed a potential blood stream infection.The patient was admitted to the hospital; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that eleven days post a port placement, the port allegedly did not function and the patient allegedly experienced hematoma, arm pain and fever due to the port.It was further reported that x-ray examination and lab tests were performed which confirmed a potential blood stream infection.Reportedly, the patient was admitted to the hospital; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 05/2021).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.The medical record alleges that a body implant port was implanted to a patient for the purpose of blood draw and immunotherapy delivery.Approximately a year and one month later the old port was removed through unknown main approach your new bard power port isp mri has been implanted after being diagnosed with the crohn's disease.The port was laying perfectly flat on the chest, and it was easily palpable.The patient was recovery and in stable condition without no complication.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence for the reported deficiency with the port in the submitted medical record review.Additionally, no objective evidence of infection and hematoma couldn't be confirmed.Furthermore, the clinical condition alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2021), g3, h6 (method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that eleven days post a port placement, the port allegedly did not function and the patient allegedly experienced hematoma, arm pain and fever due to the port.It was further reported that x-ray examination and lab tests were performed which confirmed a potential blood stream infection.Reportedly, the patient was admitted to the hospital; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Type of Device
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key16617346
MDR Text Key312009623
Report Number3006260740-2023-01011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027031
UDI-Public(01)00801741027031
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K063377
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/20/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1808060
Device Lot NumberREEP2643
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/01/2023
Initial Date FDA Received03/27/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/14/2023
03/20/2024
05/20/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/14/2023
04/16/2024
05/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured03/25/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-