Initially the jada was working and controlling the bleeding, but then it clotted off [device occlusion] patient got hysterectomy and the bleeding was controlled [device ineffective] case narrative: this initial spontaneous report originating from the united states, was received from a physician and nurse via clinical account specialist referring to a 22-year-old female patient.The patient¿s current conditions included uterine atony.The patient¿s historical conditions included singleton pregnancy, bleeding, cesarean, fetal demise, and blood products transfusion (unknown volume).The patient¿s concomitant medications were not reported.This report concerned 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date in (b)(6) 2023 (reported as 1-2 weeks ago), the patient was started on vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) (lot# and expiry date were not reported) (came with blue seal valve, kit and green carton) vaginally as directed by the health care professional (hcp) for postpartum hemorrhage (postpartum haemorrhage).The patient experienced device occlusion, device ineffective and device use error (captured in oars # (b)(4)).The device was operated by fellow, maternal fetal medicine and it may be first time for the operator.On an unknown date in (b)(6) 2023, the physician tried placing another vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) (lot# and expiry date were not reported), but it also clotted off (also reported that the second one was used as the first one clotted off and was no longer sterile) (device occlusion).The patient then underwent hysterectomy and bleeding was controlled (device ineffective).The patient sought medical attention.Therapy with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was discontinued.The availability of the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) for evaluation was unknown.Upon internal review, the event of device occlusion and device ineffective was determined to be serious: required intervention.This is one of the two reports received from the same reporter.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects health impact per annex f): 4624 surgical intervention (one or more surgical procedures was required, or an existing procedure changed.).
|