• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. BD INSYTE¿ AUTOGUARD¿ BC SHIELDED IV CATHETER; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC. BD INSYTE¿ AUTOGUARD¿ BC SHIELDED IV CATHETER; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 382512
Device Problem Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
Patient Problems Perforation of Vessels (2135); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/08/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the needle pierced through the bd insyte¿ autoguard¿ bc shielded iv catheter while advancing it during use.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "customer reported bizarre product failure.The catheter failed.In addition to the bizarre failure, hcp reports a more common issue of the needle being dull.The incident with the catheter in question went as follows.Tech set up for iv catheter as normal, stuck the patient, and upon advancement of the catheter he noticed that it was not advancing as easily as it normally does and with increased tension in comparison to people with thicker/scarred skin.After attempting to advance the catheter the tech noticed the vein had infiltrated and the surrounding area had begun to swell so he removed the iv needle and catheter together without forcing the needle back through.Upon removal the catheter and needle exited the skin with the catheter sheared off the reaming part of the needle that was in after trying to advance.He did not try pushing the needle back into the catheter before removing so it shouldn¿t have punctured the catheter.A few of the following patients that had iv attempts with the same set of iv catheters complained that the needle felt dull (more so than previous experiences with blood draws and ivs).The nuclear medicine tech had to attempt iv sticks with this lot numerous times with each patient.After ordering a different product none of these issues continued.".
 
Event Description
It was reported that the needle pierced through the bd insyte¿ autoguard¿ bc shielded iv catheter while advancing it during use.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "customer reported bizarre product failure.The catheter failed.In addition to the bizarre failure, hcp reports a more common issue of the needle being dull.The incident with the catheter in question went as follows.Tech set up for iv catheter as normal, stuck the patient, and upon advancement of the catheter he noticed that it was not advancing as easily as it normally does and with increased tension in comparison to people with thicker/scarred skin.After attempting to advance the catheter the tech noticed the vein had infiltrated and the surrounding area had begun to swell so he removed the iv needle and catheter together without forcing the needle back through.Upon removal the catheter and needle exited the skin with the catheter sheared off the reaming part of the needle that was in after trying to advance.He did not try pushing the needle back into the catheter before removing so it shouldn¿t have punctured the catheter.A few of the following patients that had iv attempts with the same set of iv catheters complained that the needle felt dull (more so than previous experiences with blood draws and ivs).The nuclear medicine tech had to attempt iv sticks with this lot numerous times with each patient.After ordering a different product none of these issues continued.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following fields were updated due to corrections: h.6.Imdrf annex e grid: e1720, e0511.H.6.Imdrf annex f grid: f11.
 
Event Description
No additional information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Our quality engineer inspected the samples and photograph submitted for evaluation.Bd received 40 (39 sealed and 1 used) 24g x 0.75in.Insyte autoguard units from lot number 2284601.Additionally, one photo was provided for investigation which is representative of what was returned and does not provide any additional evidence that isn¿t already covered by the physical sample evaluation.A gross visual inspection of the returned units found that needle was spearing through the catheter on the used unit.Since the catheter exhibited what appeared to be blood residue throughout the tubing, the damage likely occurred during the insertion process.None of the sealed samples showed any damage or the needle puncturing the catheter tubing.A functional test to simulate needle tip penetration, catheter tip penetration, and catheter drag revealed the measured force of two units exceeded the needle tip and catheter tip penetration specifications, which confirmed a dull needle and catheter tip integrity issue.The report of threading difficulty was not confirmed as the catheter drag measurements were within specification.A needle that is dull or blunt may occur in the manufacturing setting due to improper offload, operator handling, station misalignment, incorrect equipment settings, or gripper damage.It is also possible that the damage may come from the raw material.The raw material needle subassembly inspection records were verified to have been performed and completed with no quality issues or process deviations.Operators perform penetration testing per the sampling and quality plans to mitigate the occurrence of this defect.Damage to the catheter tip may occur due to a worn mandrel, dirty die, or incorrect process parameters (temperature and/or tipping force).Mandrel verification, software validation, supplier qualification of die, and catheter tip inspections are all in place to mitigate the risk from this type of defect.A device history record review showed no non-conformances associated with this issue during the production of this batch.The appropriate personnel have been notified and we appreciate you taking the time to bring this observation to our attention.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be tracked and trended.Information will be captured on trend reports and monitored.Our business team regularly reviews the collected data for identification of emerging trends.We regret any inconveniences this incident may have caused you and your facility.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD INSYTE¿ AUTOGUARD¿ BC SHIELDED IV CATHETER
Type of Device
INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC.
9450 south state street
sandy UT 84070
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON INFUSION THERAPY SYSTEMS INC.
9450 south state street
sandy UT 84070
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8448235433
MDR Report Key16640057
MDR Text Key312319620
Report Number1710034-2023-00333
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FOZ
UDI-Device Identifier00382903825127
UDI-Public00382903825127
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K201075
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number382512
Device Lot Number2284601
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/10/2023
Initial Date FDA Received03/29/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/15/2023
05/18/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/30/2023
07/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/18/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-