BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DB-3128-95B |
Device Problem
High impedance (1291)
|
Patient Problem
Scar Tissue (2060)
|
Event Date 01/23/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the second stage of the deep brain stimulation implant procedure, when the already implanted lead extension was to be connected to the ipg, this lead extension was found to have not been coiled behind the ear in a way that made it accessible during the first stage implant procedure.In addition, scar tissue built around the lead behind the ear in the time between surgeries.The physician reopened the lead incision to get to the lead and extensively manipulated the uncoiled lead.The lead extension was then tested and displayed high impedances.The physician replaced the longer lead extension with a new shorter lead extension.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The returned lead extension was analyzed and confirmed the event.High impedance readings were measured on contacts 1, 9, 10, and 11.Visual inspection revealed that the lead extension body revealed multiple burn marks with fractured cables at the burned section of the lead extension body.The burn marks appear to be due to electrocautery exposure.The ifu states electrocautery can transfer destructive current into the dbs leads and/or stimulator.Bipolar or monopolar electrocautery may be used, however, electrocautery probes must be kept a minimum of one inch away from the implanted device.Additionally, the instructions for use (ifu) product label states that fibrosis (thickened skin and scarring) around the lead extension including tightening, tethering, and bowstringing, is a known risk with the use of deep brain stimulation system.Therefore, based on all the available information, engineers confirmed the use of electrocautery, thus resulting in high impedances was likely due to an unintended user error.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the second stage of the deep brain stimulation implant procedure, when the already implanted lead extension was to be connected to the ipg, this lead extension was found to have not been coiled behind the ear in a way that made it accessible during the first stage implant procedure.In addition, scar tissue built around the lead behind the ear in the time between surgeries.The physician reopened the lead incision to get to the lead and extensively manipulated the uncoiled lead.The lead extension was then tested and displayed high impedances.The physician replaced the longer lead extension with a new shorter lead extension.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|