• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V2
Device Problems Corroded (1131); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/06/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
E1: establishment name: (b)(6) university.The subject device has been returned to olympus for evaluation.In addition to the reportable malfunction mentioned in b5, it was observed, the bending cover was found to be leaking, and the lock engagement (fe lever) was stuck.The investigation is ongoing, and a definitive root cause of the reported event cannot be determined at this time.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented accordingly.
 
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus, during reprocessing, the uretero-reno videoscope was leaking.Upon inspection of the customer¿s returned device it was observed, the bending section could not be controlled due to corrosion on the angle mechanism and the metal skeleton inside the bending tube was protruding.This report is being submitted for the malfunction found during evaluation.There was no harm or user injury reported due to the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation for phenomenon one, it is likely that the angulation failed due to corrosion inside the bending section and control section caused by a leak at the bending section.Based on the results of the investigation for phenomenon two, it is likely that the cable support was broken and protruded from the bending section cover due to excessive force on the passive bending section.The event can be prevented by following the instructions for use which state: "·inspection of the endoscope : inspect the external surface of the entire insertion section, including the bending section and the distal end for dents, bulges, swelling, scratches, peeling of coating, holes, sagging, transformation, bends, adhesion of foreign bodies, missing parts, protruding objects, or other irregularities.·do not insert the insertion tube with excessive force into the ureter or calix.The bending section may be damaged." olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16673324
MDR Text Key313026607
Report Number9610595-2023-05531
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170343582
UDI-Public04953170343582
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K172246
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/10/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/06/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/04/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/02/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/05/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MODEL NUMBER: CV-290, NO SERIAL NUMBER PROVIDED
-
-