• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number TJF-Q180V
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001); Pancreatitis (4481)
Event Date 04/21/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled, "single-operator peroral cholangioscopy cystic duct cannulation for transpapillary gallbladder stent placement in patients with acute cholecystitis at moderate to high surgical risk (with videos)".Background: one of the main reasons for failed endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (etgs) under fluoroscopic guidance is the inability to cannulate the cystic duct.Single-operator peroral cholangioscopy (soc)-assisted etgs is an adjunct technique to facilitate etgs.We aimed to demonstrate its efficacy.Methods: between 2015 and 2019, 104 patients with acute cholecystitis at moderate to high surgical risk underwent etgs, which involved 3 steps: (1) cystic duct cannulation under fluoroscopic guidance with or without additional soc guidance; (2) guidewire placement; and (3) stent placement in the gallbladder.The technical success rate was determined when stent placement was confirmed endoscopically and radiographically.Results: of 104 patients, 55 (53%) patients had successful etgs under fluoroscopic guidance.Of 49 patients who had failed fluoroscopy-guided etgs, 41 patients underwent additional soc-assisted etgs and 5 patients proceeded to other interventions.Of patients who underwent soc-assisted etgs (n z 41), 23 (56%) cystic cannulation followed by stent placement were successful; cystic duct cannulations, guidewire, and stent placement failed in 8, 9, and 1 patients, respectively.The overall technical success rate of etgs increased from 53% (55 of 104) to 75% (78 of 104) after additional soc assistance.Adverse events and recurrence were not different between patients who underwent etgs under fluoroscopic guidance and those who underwent soc-assisted etgs.Conclusions: in patients with acute cholecystitis who are not surgical candidates, soc-assisted etgs can increase the technical success rate after failed fluoroscopic guidance.Soc can help for the cystic duct cannulation and guidewire placement steps but not for the stent placement step.Type of adverse events/number of patients bleeding - 3 patients perforation due to guidewire - 2 patients pancreatitis - 1 patient *fever was observed in 2 patients and is a non-serious event.This literature article requires 2 reports.The related patient identifiers are as follows: 1, (b)(6) (pr-233q) 2,(b)(6) (tjf-q180v) this medwatch report is for patient identifier (b)(6).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse events cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS EXERA II DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16679126
MDR Text Key312672448
Report Number9610595-2023-05589
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDT
UDI-Device Identifier04953170339967
UDI-Public04953170339967
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTH
PMA/PMN Number
K143153
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTJF-Q180V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/05/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/04/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/10/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
NON-OLYMPUS: GLO-TIP; NON-OLYMPUS: SPYGLASS; NON-OLYMPUS: ULTRATOME XL
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-