• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZA9003
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Insert (1316)
Patient Problems Retinal Detachment (2047); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/07/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after fully inserting an intraocular lens (iol) into a patient¿s right eye, the surgeon noticed that the lens was rippled and did not like position of the lens.The surgeon used steinert ii lens folding forceps to remove the lens.Posted procedure done were indicated to be 25 gauge vitrectomy, intraocular lens exchange, and endolaser.A non-johnson and johnson lens of 23.5 diopter was used as a replacement.The procedure completed successfully with no patient injury reported.No medical interventions required.The patient tolerated procedure well and was transported to post anesthesia care unit (pacu).Additional information received confirmed that there was no capsule tear, the vitrectomy was planned which was performed during this same procedure.It was noted that the surgeon's operational note indicated that "inspection of the retina under the resight viewing system revealed an already present posterior vitreous detachment.The endolaser was used for the detachment." this was completed prior to lens exchange.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information/corrected data: in review, based on the additional information received from the customer which indicated that the posterior vitreous detachment happened prior to cataract surgery, it was determined that the "health effect ¿ ¿clinical code 2047 - retinal detachment & health effect - impact code 4624 - surgical intervention" no longer applies, and instead the "health effect - clinical code 4582" is applicable to this event.Also, in review of the additional information, the event is no longer considered to be an "adverse event"; therefore, sections "b1-adverse event & b2- required intervention to prevent permanent impairment/damage (devices)" are no longer applicable; therefore, this event is only a "malfunction" case.The following fields were updated accordingly: section h1: type of reportable event: malfunction section h6: health effect - clinical code: 4582 - no clinical signs, symptoms or conditions.Additional information: section b5: the affected eye was the left eye.Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: apr 5, 2023.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of the original folding carton.Patient stickers, a patient identification (id) card, the original lens case, and additional documentation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut and a haptic was damaged (severed).The lens was cleaned and, no additional issues were observed with the lens.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue of ¿positioning issue and lens damaged¿ were not confirmed.The observed "haptic damaged" is similar to the reported complaint issue of lens damaged.However, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: in review, it was noticed that left eye was inadvertently indicated as the affected eye in the supplemental mdr report #1 which is incorrect; therefore, the information has been corrected in this supplemental mdr report and the following field was updated accordingly: section b5: the affected eye was the right eye.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key16685897
MDR Text Key312756285
Report Number3012236936-2023-00835
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474529090
UDI-Public(01)05050474529090(17)271126
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P990080
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberZA9003
Device Catalogue NumberZA90030240
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/08/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/05/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/05/2023
04/28/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/29/2023
04/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/26/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
PROVISC
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight80 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAmerican Indian Or Alaskan Native
-
-