|
Model Number M006175263010 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Burning Sensation (2146)
|
Event Date 03/21/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The exact date of the event is unknown.The provided event date, (b)(6) 2023, was chosen as a best estimate based on the date that the manufacturer became aware of the event, (b)(6) 2023.Imdrf patient code e1310 captures the reportable event of urinary tract infection.Imdrf impact code f23 captures he reportable event of unexpected medical intervention.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a percuflex plus ureteral stent was used during a urology stent procedure in the kidney on an unspecified date.Post procedure, the patient experienced burning urination and a bladder infection.An early, unplanned stent removal procedure was performed, on (b)(6) 2023, to explant the stent.Another device of the same model was implanted and used to complete the procedure.There were no medication or treatment given to the patient for the burning urination and bladder infection.The patient's condition was reported as stable, and the event was noted to have been resolved approximately one month after stent removal.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blocks d4 (lot number and expiration date) and h4 (device manufacture date) were updated based on the batch/lot number of the returned product.Block b3: the exact date of the event is unknown.The provided event date, (b)(6) 2023, was chosen as a best estimate based on the date that the manufacturer became aware of the event, (b)(6) 2023.Block h6: imdrf patient code e1310 captures the reportable event of urinary tract infection.Imdrf impact code f23 captures he reportable event of unexpected medical intervention.Block h10: the returned percuflex plus ureteral stent was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the stent and the coil were in good condition and no damage was observed on the device.There was discoloration (blackened color) noted along the stent as part of the procedure.A photo of the device was also provided and showed no damage.A functional test was performed and a use of mandrel of 0.039" was used and passed through the stent successfully with no resistance.The "infection, urinary tract" reported is a known adverse event associated with the use of the device and it is noted within the instructions for use (ifu) and is known and documented in the labeling.Therefore, the most probable cause of the reported event is known inherent risk of the device.Based on a previous study for different ureteral stents and all the gathered information, the stent discoloration is caused by reaction of sulfide in urine with bismuth bicarbonate in the stent to produce bismuth sulfide.It is a non-harmful/cosmetic and does not increase stent-associated complications during use or its functionality.Therefore, no problem detected is selected as the most probable root cause for the complaint since there were no failures encountered in the device and no known problem was reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a percuflex plus ureteral stent was used during a urology stent procedure in the kidney on an unspecified date.Post procedure, the patient experienced burning urination and a bladder infection.An early, unplanned stent removal procedure was performed, on (b)(6) 2023, to explant the stent.Another device of the same model was implanted and used to complete the procedure.There were no medication or treatment given to the patient for the burning urination and bladder infection.The patient's condition was reported as stable, and the event was noted to have been resolved approximately one month after stent removal.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|