It was reported that during the thrombectomy procedure, the subject catheter shaft was broken/fractured.The physician was unable to perform the thromboaspiration due to the presence of air bubbles.The physician replaced it with a new device and completed the procedure successfully.Additional information received on 24-mar-2023 confirmed that the patient died due to the underlying aortic value disease.Additional information received on 11-apr-2023 clarified that the subject catheter breakage did not contribute to the patient's death and the cause of death of the patient was probably multifactorial, including aortic valve disease.The patient was in fluid overload of cardiogenic origin before the procedure.
|
It was reported that during the thrombectomy procedure, the subject catheter shaft was broken/fractured.The physician was unable to perform the thromboaspiration due to the presence of air bubbles.The physician replaced it with a new device and completed the procedure successfully.Additional information received on 24-mar-2023 confirmed that the patient died due to the underlying aortic value disease.Additional information received on 11-apr-2023 clarified that the subject catheter breakage did not contribute to the patient's death and the cause of death of the patient was probably multifactorial, including aortic valve disease.The patient was in fluid overload of cardiogenic origin before the procedure.
|
Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes), there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual/microscopic inspection, the catheter shaft was seen to be broken/fractured 6.5cm from the catheter hub.The catheter shaft was seen to be kinked/bent 93cm and 115.5cm from the catheter hub.Functional inspection was not required as the defect was confirmed during device analysis.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint was confirmed based on analysis.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.The catheter shaft was seen to be broken/fractured and kinked/bent, therefore conforming the as reported event.The as reported as well as the as analyzed code, ¿catheter shaft broken/fractured during use' as well as the analyzed code, 'catheter shaft kinked/bent' will be assigned procedural factors as this complaint appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.
|