DEPUY MITEK LLC US EXPRESSEW III SUTURE PASSER W/O HOOK; SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER, REUSABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 214140 |
Device Problem
Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/04/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).D4: the expiration date is currently unavailable.E3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by sales rep that during a rotator cuff repair procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the expressew iii suture passer w/o hook device had loose jaws that it was not fully grabbing the tissue.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.This complaint involves x (x) devices.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H4: the device manufacture date was reported as unknown on the initial report; and has been updated accordingly.H10 correction narrative: d4: the lot number has been updated to reflect the correct information.Therefore, udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary = > the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of the device received.The device was received and evaluated.Upon visual inspection revealed wear marks on the device as usual in this type of reusables devices.The device does not show any structural anomalies.Upon reviewing the upper jaw, it was found that is loose.When the trigger was fully depressed, the jaw cannot be closed completely.Due to the condition of the jaw, the functional test cannot be performed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 58402, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.According with the visual inspection result, this complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the loose jaw can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure, a bigger portion of tissue may have been grabbed and forced the jaw to close, also, since this device is reusable, the continuous use and sterilization process can cause metal fatigue leading to a non-closing jaw, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.As per ifu, it is important to inspect the device prior to use to ensure proper mechanical function and do not use if product is damaged.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|