Device evaluated by mfr: (b)(4), a territory manager (tm) of tidi products visited the facility after the reported complaint.The product was not returned for evaluation but the tm was able to provide images of the failed product and feedback from customer communications.It was noted that the incident occurred in the behavioral health area in the emergency room where the patient was combative/agitated.The product was first applied to the patient before securing to the bed.Tm advised the customer to attach the product to the bed first making sure that they are not trying to connect the three-point buckle while the patient is pulling and kicking.The images provided revealed that the center prong of a male three point buckle and one of the side prongs are broken.The broken pieces are not in the pictures.Close examination of the broken areas does not reveal any void on the plastic material that would suggest that the issue is related to a manufacturing issue.The possible root cause of this deficiency was that as the patient was pulling and kicking, the customer was trying to connect the male and female buckles even though the buckles were misaligned causing two of the prongs to be damaged.A device history record (dhr) of the affected lot number did not reveal any issues that could have contributed to the reported incident.No ncrs were identified.The unit passed all verification testing and met manufacturing specifications prior to being released for distribution.Based on the information provided by the tidi territory manager, there is no evidence that a manufacturing non-conformity contributed to the reported complaint.Therefore, no corrective or preventative actions are necessary.All complaints are trended and reviewed by management on a monthly basis.As part of this monthly review, any excursion above the control limits for this failure mode will be assessed, documented and acted upon as warranted manufacturer reference file (b)(4).
|