• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GYRUS ACMI, INC. 10FR FIXEDPIN HEMOSTATIC PROBE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GYRUS ACMI, INC. 10FR FIXEDPIN HEMOSTATIC PROBE Back to Search Results
Model Number CD-B612LA
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/25/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device was returned to the service center for evaluation; however, the device evaluation is still pending.Supplemental report(s) will be submitted should any relevant new information is available and or received.Investigation is ongoing.This report will be supplemented accordingly following investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported the device was used for a case (an unspecified procedure) and during the procedure, the sheath of bicoag probe was fractured around the site of duodenum before the user apply the heat energy.There was no adverse event reported.No harm or injury to patient was reported.No user injury reported due to the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on response to follow up.Communication with the customer via company representative conveyed the following information: two cd-b612la devices failed in the same procedure.The failures were reported under patient identifier c23157666 (lot kr206276) and patient identifier (b)(6) (lot kr200145).The procedure was a therapeutic upper gastrointestinal (gi) endoscopy.The intended procedure was completed with a third device (same model, different lot).No fragments fell into the patient's body.It is unknown whether there was any delay in the procedure.There was no medical intervention.The reported failures did not affect the outcome of the procedure.This supplemental report is for patient identifier (b)(6) (lot kr200145).Investigation is ongoing.This report will be supplemented accordingly following investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The initial medwatch incorrectly reported the site registration number.The site registration number is (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on device return evaluation and the legal manufacturer's final investigation.Please also refer to h4 for manufacturing date updates.The device manufacturing date is being corrected from march 5, 2022 of the initial mdr report.The correct manufacturing date is feb 10, 2022.The returned device was inspected, and the complaint was confirmed.The device was returned in its original packaging.The model was confirmed to be cd-b612la and lot was kr200145.Upon inspection, it was observed that the probe sheath above the hemostasis tip was broken but not completely detached, and the internal wires remained intact.The presence of blood residue on the sheath, on the probe tip, and inside the luer, indicated prior usage.No other damages were observed besides the broken tip.To test functionality, the device was connected to a bipolar generator, and the tip was submerged in a small amount of saline.The application of energy resulted in bubbling of the saline, indicating proper energy transmission.Due to the broken tip, testing of irrigation capability was not possible.In summary, the device functioned as intended, however, the probe sheath above the hemostasis tip was broken.Review of device history record (dhr) records provided no indication that manufacturing procedures contributed to the reported event.All records indicate that the product was manufactured and tested in accordance with all applicable procedures and met all final product release criteria.Based on inspection findings, the observed sheath fracture may have resulted from the probe being buckled and bound inside the scope's channel with excessive force or the distal probe tip being subjected to blunt force against a hard object.However, the exact cause could not be definitively determined during the investigation.Page 6 of the device ifu (instructions for use_p9100505-001_ah) addresses this: "do not use the device if resistance to insertion is encountered.Reduce the angle or lower the forceps elevator of the endoscope until the device passes smoothly; do not advance or extend the device abruptly; insert the device slowly.Abrupt insertion may cause damage to the endoscope or the device." in addition, page 3 of the ifu states ¿keep the device tip in sight during use.Inadvertent activation or movement of the device outside the field of vision may result in patient injury." olympus will continue to monitor complaints for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
10FR FIXEDPIN HEMOSTATIC PROBE
Type of Device
HEMOSTATIC PROBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
GYRUS ACMI, INC.
9600 louisiana avenue north
brooklyn park MN 55445
Manufacturer (Section G)
GYRUS ACMI, INC.
9600 louisiana avenue north
brooklyn park MN 55445
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16777425
MDR Text Key313663565
Report Number3005975494-2023-00078
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier00821925039476
UDI-Public00821925039476
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeHK
PMA/PMN Number
K123319
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberCD-B612LA
Device Lot NumberKR200145
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/06/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/27/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/20/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/21/2023
05/01/2023
05/24/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/15/2023
05/18/2023
06/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/10/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-