• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOPERSURGICAL INC. NEO-PREP SM SKIN BARRIER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOPERSURGICAL INC. NEO-PREP SM SKIN BARRIER Back to Search Results
Model Number 44-8000
Device Problem Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem Skin Tears (2516)
Event Date 04/11/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Per details reported on incoming (b)(4): "pressure injuries - a couple babies received pressure injuries on the lower half of their upper lip (where the ett exits the mouth).None reported on the area above the lips where the neofit device is actually placed.Neoprep was in use.Reminded that the neofit should not be touching the upper lip or nose & can be trimmed to conform to babies anatomy.Suggested that the device may be placed a little too high and pulling the ett tube into that upper inside lip area.Reiterated that increased activity level of the infant can contribute to tube movement as well as positioning of the baby.They did share that the particular baby that experienced the worst pressure sore was extremely active.Mentioned that neofit is ideal for most infants, but there are those few (due to skin sensitivity, agitation levels, etc.) that it may not be suited for.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Coopersurgical, inc is currently investigating the reported conditon.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on further review of the reported condition and additonal information received , coopersurgical, inc.Has deemed this incident to be a non reportable event.This complaint file will be evaluated as a standard product complaint investigation.
 
Event Description
Per details reported on incoming (b)(4)."pressure injuries - a couple babies received pressure injuries on the lower half of their upper lip (where the ett exits the mouth).None reported on the area above the lips where the neofit device is actually placed.Neoprep was in use.Reminded that the neofit should not be touching the upper lip or nose & can be trimmed to conform to babies anatomy.Suggested that the device may be placed a little too high and pulling the ett tube into that upper inside lip area.Reiterated that increased activity level of the infant can contribute to tube movement as well as positioning of the baby.They did share that the particular baby that experienced the worst pressure sore was extremely active.Mentioned that neofit is ideal for most infants, but there are those few (due to skin sensitivity, agitation levels, etc.) that it may not be suited for.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEO-PREP SM SKIN BARRIER
Type of Device
NEO-PREP SM SKIN BARRIER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOPERSURGICAL INC.
95 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
75 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
Manufacturer Contact
michael marone
50 coporate dr.
trumbull, CT 06611
4752651665
MDR Report Key16806353
MDR Text Key313912689
Report Number1216677-2023-00070
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KGX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model Number44-8000
Device Catalogue Number44-8000
Device Lot NumberNOT PROVIDED
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/11/2023
Initial Date FDA Received04/25/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/11/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
-
-