• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC PHOTODYNAMIC BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEM; IN VIVO INTRAMEDUILLARY FIXATION ROD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC PHOTODYNAMIC BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEM; IN VIVO INTRAMEDUILLARY FIXATION ROD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number USSL-1822090
Device Problem Gas/Air Leak (2946)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/06/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This mdr report is based on the reclassification of a previously reviewed complaint.During treatment of a metastatic pelvis for a 78 year old female, the user was not able to establish negative pressure during the balloon prep.The implant was not used.Another implant from the same lot number was used to successfully complete the procedure.No harm to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This mdr report is based on the reclassification of a previously reviewed complaint.The complaint product was not returned for device evaluation, and no radiographs or photographs were provided to aid in the investigation.Dhr review: a review of the manufacturing records for the device in question was performed and found that the device met its final release specifications at time of manufacture and release.Followup information provided by the user: the plan for this procedure was to use multiple illuminoss implants to treat a metastatic pelvis.The first implant had been successfully prepared and placed without issue.The 2nd device malfunctioned as documented here, after which the user proceeded to successfully prep and insert 3 additional implants.Regarding this malfunction: the user tried several times with 3 different syringes, and could not draw a vacuum in the balloon.There was no harm to the patient or major delay.The balloon never made it to the operative site.The clinic is one that is experienced with the illuminoss product and the proper technique for handling, set up, and use of the device.The treating physician has done many cases.The or technician supporting this case was experienced and demonstrated proficiency in balloon prep activities.The user performed device preparation per the instructions for use.The firm determined that user error is unlikely to have caused or contributed to this event.Without the ability to perform product evaluation, the firm could not evaluate if there was any evidence of device damage that would have been sustained through rough handling, for instance screwing down the syringe too tightly onto the stopcock.However, from user follow up information provided, this is a very experienced treating physician and an experienced or technician.Therefore while it is theoretically possible that the stopcock to syringe connection could have sustained damage through mis-use during device prep of the 2nd implant, which could have led to the observed failure mode, it is unlikely.There is no evidence to suggest that there was any improper handling of this implant delivery system.Review of validation testing was performed.The inability of the syringe to evacuate all the air our of the balloon catheter indicates either the syringe is not functional, or there is a leak somewhere along the balloon catheter assembly and balloon.As the user reported attempting to evacuate the air for the device using 3 different syringes, the syringe performance can be eliminated from the investigation into root cause, and the investigation focused on balloon inflation strength and component bond integrity.The specifications of this implant design's balloon inflation strength as well as bonded component strength were found to have been tested and validated.This review of validation testing concludes that this balloon catheter design was validated for the performance and mechanical strength of the balloon, components, and bonds to perform balloon inflation per the instructions for use.Ifu review: instructions for use include the device preparation steps performed by this user in this case, to "evacuate all of the air out of the implant" prior to proceeding to priming the balloon with monomer.Conclusion: the investigation was not able to identify a cause for this malfunction.Therefore, the root cause is undetermined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PHOTODYNAMIC BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEM
Type of Device
IN VIVO INTRAMEDUILLARY FIXATION ROD
Manufacturer (Section D)
ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC
993 waterman ave
east providence RI 02914
Manufacturer (Section G)
ILLUMINOSS MEDICAL, INC
993 waterman ave
east providence RI 02914
Manufacturer Contact
robert rabiner
993 waterman ave
east providence, RI 02914
4017140008
MDR Report Key16811931
MDR Text Key313994312
Report Number3006845464-2023-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K181228
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2024
Device Catalogue NumberUSSL-1822090
Device Lot Number400896
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/08/2021
Initial Date FDA Received04/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/10/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight54 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-