Siemens became aware of an issue with the sensis vibe hemo system.During an emergency patient procedure, the ecg signal was lost.The user attempted to replace electrodes, lead wires, and trunk cable as well disconnecting and reconnecting the hisib.The patient was moved to an alternate system to complete the procedure.There are no indications of any adverse effects on the health status of the involved patient.
|
Siemens healthineers completed the investigation of the reported event.The investigation was performed based on expert discussions, consideration of the complaint description, customer service reports, system history, and system log files.It was initially reported that there was a loss of ecg vital sign during an emergency case.The log file investigation revealed that the patient was examined for 1.5 hours with unavailable ecg.Further clarification showed that the patient was connected to a second portable monitoring system that monitors ecg, spo2, nibp and etco2 from the beginning.Therefore, the user was able to see the ecg the whole time, including during the relocation time.The reason why the patient was relocated is that the user rebooted the system for troubleshooting reasons and when the system was coming up, auto-login was not enabled for unknown reason.The user did not know the password and therefore relocated the patient to another room.The procedure was finished without any further issues on the other system.No patient health consequences were communicated.Detailed investigation revealed that the cause of the ecg disappearing is that ecg signal drifting outside of the dynamic range of the sensis system.Among the various causes of the ecg signal drifting out of the dynamic range, the most reasonable cause for this case, according to experts, is that the problem was caused by poor contact between the electrode and the skin.It is likely that reapplying/pressing the electrodes to the patient would have reduced the offsets and an ecg would have been available.The system instruction for use gives adequate guidance on proper ecg electrode handling, ecg acquisition techniques and correct lead placement.Furthermore, it was recommended to always have the auto-login enabled.The occurrence rate of the aforementioned error pattern was checked.A possible error accumulation or even a systematic error, which leads to a corrective action of the installed base, could not be determined by the investigation.The incident described was not classified as a reportable adverse event after a thorough investigation because neither serious injury, death, nor unexpected prolonged hospitalization of the patient or other person occurred or is to be expected, even if the incident recurs.The corresponding probability according to the risk analysis is in the range of "inconceivable".This complaint remains classified as a product problem.The complaint has been closed.
|