This mdr report is based on the reclassification of a previously reviewed complaint.During a procedure to treat metastatic distal humerus fracture, supplemented with a plate, a 6.0mm reamer broke during surgery.All pieces of the device were removed from the patient.There was no impact on the patient.
|
This mdr report is based on the reclassification of a previously reviewed complaint.Followup information provided by the user: the user was performing fixation for a metastatic distal humerus fracture, with illuminoss implant and plate.The procedure involved removing a tumor as well.The entry point for the procedure was retrograde.The surgeon mentioned that they needed to exert additional force on the reamer when operating it within the bone canal.The reamer broke fairly soon after the user began using it.All the pieces of the broken reamer were removed with use of the ball-tipped guidewire.There was no impact on the patient.Records review: a review of manufacturing records was performed, and found that the device met specification at the time of manufacture and release.Returned product evaluation: the firm was not able to perform product evaluation on the device, as it was disposed of at the hospital.Although the product was not returned for evaluation, pictures of the device were provided.These images show a clean break pattern.Conclusion: existing evidence supports that over-torquing of the device is a possible cause of this event, although this cannot be definitely proven with the evidence available to the firm at this time.
|