• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH PRIMARY TRITANIUM HEMI CLUSTER HOLE CUP 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH PRIMARY TRITANIUM HEMI CLUSTER HOLE CUP 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 502-03-54E
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 04/06/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding malposition and loosening involving a trident shell was reported.The event of malposition was confirmed.Loosening was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection, dimensional, functional and material analysis could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: a review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated " this patient underwent a primary right total hip arthroplasty at some point in the past.The patient developed a loosening of the acetabular component which necessitated revision surgery of the cup, and replacement of the femoral head component.I can confirm that the patient developed a problem with the right total hip as i was able to see the x-ray with the cup completely vertical.Loosening cannot be determined based on the x-ray provided.I cannot confirm that the revision took place since i have no documentation except the date of explantation as provided in the product inquiry summary.I have no surgeon notes or operation reports.The root causes of acetabular loosening are multifactorial and dependent on when the loosening occurs.These factors include surgical technique factors, and patient factors including bmi and activity level.If loosening occurs in the early postoperative period, then surgical technique factors would most likely be a likely cause.I would not assign any causality to the implant based on information reviewed [.]" -product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.-complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to shell loosening.A review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated " this patient underwent a primary right total hip arthroplasty at some point in the past.The patient developed a loosening of the acetabular component which necessitated revision surgery of the cup, and replacement of the femoral head component.I can confirm that the patient developed a problem with the right total hip as i was able to see the x-ray with the cup completely vertical.Loosening cannot be determined based on the x-ray provided.I cannot confirm that the revision took place since i have no documentation except the date of explantation as provided in the product inquiry summary.I have no surgeon notes or operation reports.The root causes of acetabular loosening are multifactorial and dependent on when the loosening occurs.These factors include surgical technique factors, and patient factors including bmi and activity level.If loosening occurs in the early postoperative period, then surgical technique factors would most likely be a likely cause.I would not assign any causality to the implant based on information reviewed.The explanted components should be submitted to stryker engineers for examination and analysis." malposition was confirmed but from the given information, it could not be determined whether it was initially implanted in that position or loosened and thus moved to a vertical position.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient's right hip was revised due to shell loosening.A shell, mdm metal liner, adm/ mdm poly insert, and femoral head were revised to competitor acetabular components and stryker femoral head.There were no allegations against the revised head or liner construct.Rep can provide pictures and confirmed that otherwise, no further information will be released by the hospital or surgeon.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRIMARY TRITANIUM HEMI CLUSTER HOLE CUP 54MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
marisol santiago
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key16850667
MDR Text Key314350496
Report Number0002249697-2023-00454
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327040142
UDI-Public07613327040142
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K143085
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number502-03-54E
Device Catalogue Number502-03-54E
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/06/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight102 KG
-
-