Mdr- (b)(4) - device issues: other device issue, device: not related, procedure: not related, deficiency: no.30 days post procedure stent removed as no longer needed.Radiodiagnostic contrast output through the stent - prolonged hospital stay? treated by hospital admission.Event status: not documented, treatment: medical : hospital admission, death: no.
|
Pma/510(k) # (b)(4).Device evaluation: the 01x evo-fc-r-20-25-10-e device of lot number c1604915 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.This file was created in response to the pmcf study mdr-2054 to capture ¿off label use¿.The device lab evaluation could not be completed as the device, or photographic evidence of the device, was not returned for evaluation.Manufacturing records review: prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Instructions for use and/label review: there is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use/product label.Upon reviewing the complaint detail/events provided, it was noted that the device was used against the intended use outlined in the ifu.As per the instruction for use (ifu0067), the intended use is listed as ¿this device is used to maintain luminal patency of the esophagus in cases of: obstruction caused by intrinsic or extrinsic malignancies, refractory benign strictures, or to seal tracheoesophageal fistulas¿ while the complaint device was used for post-surgical stenosis in the tubular gastrectomy area and is therefore off-label use.Off label use complaints are considered to be unforeseen misuse.It is unknown how the device will function outside of its intended use.Trending will monitor if any future investigation is required.Image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis: a definitive root cause of off label use was identified from the available information.As stated above, the device was placed in the tubular gastrectomy area for post-surgical stenosis which is a contradiction to the intended use of the device outlined in the instructions for use.As per the patient casebook, ae1 was reported as ¿radiodiagnostic contrast output through the stent¿.As per the casebook and clinical input received, the evolution esophageal stent did not cause or contribute to the reported ae.Instead, the cause listed in the casebook was due to patients pre-existing conditions ¿possible suture dehiscence from bariatric surgery¿.Confirmation of complaint: complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Confirmed quantity of 01x used device summary of investigation: according to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.The patient was admitted to hospital to treat the radiodiagnostic contrast output through the stent and was stabilised.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|