• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V
Device Problem Scratched Material (3020)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus that the utero-reno videoscope's "angle up" does not work.There was no patient harm reported.During evaluation of the device, the forceps plug mouthpiece were found to be scraped.This mdr is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunction found during the device evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation, and the customer's allegation was confirmed due to a broken wire, the bending part does not move even if the angle lever is moved.In addition to the scraping of the forceps stopper cap and the forceps channel port being shaved, the evaluation findings are as follows: bending angle in the down direction was out of standard value, the bending section cover's water tightness was lost due to a pinhole, due to damage, the channel tube's channel cleaning brush cannot be inserted smooth and the forceps cannot be inserted and cannot be inserted smoothly, the bending tube had a dent, the video connector case was scratched, the light guide connector had a scratch, the universal cord had a scratch, the angulation lever was scratched, the grip was scratched, the switch box was scratched, the image guide protector had a scratch, the protector on the video cable section was cut, the video cable was wrinkled and scratched, the channel tube had buckling, due to a pinhole in the channel tube, water tightness was lost, due to damage on the channel tube, the tube cleaning brush cannot be inserted, and the connecting tube was dented, the investigation is ongoing, and a supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided by the user facility.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, the root cause of the event was unable to be identified; however, the event likely occurred due to physical stress.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16854575
MDR Text Key314397630
Report Number3002808148-2023-04451
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340321
UDI-Public04953170340321
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K072957
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/05/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/05/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/02/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/09/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/25/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-