The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, as of the date of this medical investigation, supporting clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient impact beyond the reported revision cannot be determined with the limited information provided.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, instructions for use, risk management file and prior actions review could not be performed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.No details about the cause of the revision surgery were provided, therefore no factors that can contribute can be delineated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.H11: corrected information in b5, and h6 (health effect - clinical code).
|
It was reported that, after a tha had been implanted on an unspecified date, a revision surgery was scheduled on (b)(6) 2023.The specific reason for revision is unclear, but the surgeon's plan was: (i) changing the liner and head; and (ii) removing the synergy stem if found loose.The surgeon revised the stem and the bearings.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|