• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Electromagnetic Interference (1194); Failure to Interrogate (1332); Energy Output Problem (1431); Ambient Noise Problem (2877); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Insufficient Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/03/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient (pt) who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for gastrointestinal/pelvic floor and urinary dysfunction/sacral nerve stim.It was reported that the ins seemed to "accelerate" after the dentist.Patient had increased stimulation (stim) the day before their dentist appointment.Patient had stim on during the dentist appointment.Patient said they thought they could leave stim on because the dentist was not using any drills.Patient said the dentist did use an ultra sonic probe.Patient said the book they have didn't say anything about ultrasonic probes.Patient said their whole back was hurting up to their neck and shoulders.Patient felt a slow tapping sensation which was constant.Patient turned stim off and thought it had improved.Patient thought right now they were feeling pain from it happening.Patient said it was better but not wonderful.Patient said going to the dr was not practical for them. patient called back and repeated same information.Patient did say they felt the tapping this morning and still had the horrible back pain.Patient said they did turn stimulation down earlier and the tapping was lesser however it was still there.They had turned the therapy off for about 20-30 minutes and said they didn't feel the tapping but did feel the back pain.Patient services reviewed option to leave stimulation off longer or to switch programs.Patient said would need assistance in changing programs so decided will keep stimulation off for a few hours and later this afternoon around 4pm will have another person who can assist and may call back to review how to switch programs.Patient to monitor symptoms.Patient was directed to contact managing healthcare provider (hcp) to report their symptoms. pt called back to get further assistance with switching programs.Pt did reiterate the issue they had a the dentist using diathermy.Pt services walked pt through how to switch programs so that stim was comfortable and felt in the bike seat area.Pt will leave stim here and monitor symptoms.The patient called back on 2023-may-05 and stated when they last spoke to pt services they had left the stimulation at 0.1.Pt stated they only had it on for 1.5 hours and then started noticing a buzzing when laying down.Pt stated it was uncomfortable so they wanted to know if that was the end of the program they were on.Pt services reviewed stim should be comfortable so pt may want to consider switching to a different program.Pt states they will try that and monitor things.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.Pt called back and stated they have been through all the programs and are on their very last one, program 7.Pt states so far this seems to be doing well and hasn't woken up at night with a "marching band going on between her legs".Pt states they are concerned that they won't be able to shut it off if this does start to occur however.Pt states on (b)(6) 2023 this did happen and the only way they could get it to stop was by changing the program.Pt did verify that they had successfully slid the blue ball in the off position but was still feeling stim.Pt services reviewed possible residual stim or possible shift in device causing nerve issues.Pt services encouraged pt to follow up with doctor if this continues on the current program.Pt states they have a doctor's appointment next (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient called back and repeated a lot of the same information in regards to what occurred after the dental cleaning.She said her leads are doing crazy things at night.Causing pain not just in the bicycle seat area.It goes down her leg and up her back toward her shoulder blade.Patient said she has been working with the doctor and the pa in switching programs.Patient wanted to know about mri.Helped her put her device in mri mode and she showed full body eligible.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.Pt called back and stated they have been through all the programs and are on their very last one, program 7.Pt states so far this seems to be doing well and hasn't woken up at night with a "marching band going on between her legs".Pt states they are concerned that they won't be able to shut it off if this does start to occur however.Pt states on (b)(6) 2023 this did happen and the only way they could get it to stop was by changing the program.Pt did verify that they had successfully slid the blue ball in the off position but was still feeling stim.Pt services reviewed possible residual stim or possible shift in device causing nerve issues.Pt services encouraged pt to follow up with doctor if this continues on the current program.Pt states they have a doctor's appointment next (b)(6).(b)(6) 2024 (b)(4) (con): the patient called back today and notes that the issue has only gotten worse.The ins remains showing as off but she still feels like something is there and it is 'vibrating all night'.The caller states she spoke with their healthcare provider (hcp) and the hcp said to 'leave it in for a year' and it might be fine.The patient states she cannot sleep.The patient states that she told hcp around christmas that the system needs to come out but the office was closed until the first of the year.The patient called back on the 1st of the year and hcp was no longer practicing so now she is going back to another hcp and has an appointment on (b)(6).The caller stated briefly that she could not connect to her ins but during the call she did connect to ins and confirmed ins remains showing as off.Agent noted that caller should continue to try to work with doctor on the issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id neu_unknown lot# serial# unknown implanted: explanted: product type unknown medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key16886880
MDR Text Key314757710
Report Number3004209178-2023-06094
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000449711
UDI-Public00763000449711
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2023
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/04/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/08/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/10/2023
01/10/2024
02/28/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/03/2023
02/01/2024
03/22/2024
Date Device Manufactured09/09/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H10...."; "SEE H10...."; "SEE H11...."
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-