Model Number 3401 |
Device Problems
Failure to Convert Rhythm (1540); Failure to Sense (1559); Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573); Low impedance (2285); Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/12/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
At this time, the product has not been returned.If the product is returned, analysis will be performed and this report would be updated at that time.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a change out procedure for normal battery depletion, after the new subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) was implanted and the shock test was performed there was non-conversion of induced ventricular tachycardia (vt).Another charge was given and there was no signal on the electrogram (egm).An external shock was given to the patient.The shock impedance was at 10 ohms and the device was unable to charge for another shock.The physician opted to explant the existing electrode and implant a new s-icd and electrode.It was noted that the electrode had been repositioned during the procedure due to concern over future perforation.There was also concern over a shock into a shorted condition.Visual inspection of the s-icd and electrode did not reveal any findings.The attempted s-icd and chronic electrode were taken out of the patient and a new s-icd system was successfully implanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a change out procedure for normal battery depletion, after the new subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) was implanted and the shock test was performed there was non-conversion of induced ventricular tachycardia (vt).Another charge was given and there was no signal on the electrogram (egm).An external shock was given to the patient.The shock impedance was at 10 ohms and the device was unable to charge for another shock.The physician opted to explant the existing electrode and implant a new s-icd and electrode.It was noted that the electrode had been repositioned during the procedure due to concern over future perforation.There was also concern over a shock into a shorted condition.Visual inspection of the s-icd and electrode did not reveal any findings.The attempted s-icd and chronic electrode were taken out of the patient and a new s-icd system was successfully implanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
At this time, the product has not been returned.If the product is returned, analysis will be performed and this report would be updated at that time.It was reported that the complete electrode was returned intact.Visual inspection noted cuts in the insultation at approximately 100 mm from the terminal end which was determined to be damaged during the revision procedure.The lead did not pass electrical testing.An x-ray was taken which showed the high voltage cable conductor was fracture at approximately 100 mm from the terminal end.This was determined to be due to the insulation being punctured during the revision procedure.Analysis determined that the difficulty converting rhythm, failure to sense, shock impedance low out of range, and failure to shock or properly shock issues noted in the field were confirmed and determined to be due to the fractured high voltage cable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|