LIVANOVA USA INC CARIOP CANN + VENT 14 GA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number AR-11114 |
Device Problems
Increase in Pressure (1491); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 04/12/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Liva nova usa inc has received a report that, during procedure, when injecting cardioplegia solution in the patient's aortic root, the perfusionist detected unusual high pressure above 600 mmhg.Injection was stopped.A second cardioplegia injection attempt confirmed the hypertension.Medical team elected to change out the cardioplegia cannula.The procedure was completed with no issue.After removal of the cannula, a water injection into the cannula showed a reflux on the lateral line.There is no report of any patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A.1.-a.5.Patient information were not provided.H.10.Sorin group italia manufactures the aortic root cannula.The incident occurred in france.If any additional information pertinent to the reported event is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Through follow up livanova learned that cardioplegia perfusion is performed by an electric syringe pusher which has an integrated pressure sensor detecting pressures up to 900mm hg.In this case, the pressure observed exceeded 500mmhg while the set flow rate was not yet reached (around 200ml/blood and 200ml/h on the electric potassium syringe), thus the perfusion procedure was stop and another type of cardioplegia cannula was used.The syringe pusher was in good working and reliable (check done).When the cardioplegia cannula was removed from the aorta and tested the flow was very low.The tip of the cannula was extremely soft.The nurse used a full 50ml syringe connecting to the luer lock of the cannula.When pressure was applied, liquid escaped through the lateral branch (used for intra-aortic aspiration) and not through the tip of the cannula as expected, thus indicating an obstruction or bad passage at its tip.The dhr review highlighted that the lot whose claimed product belong to was released as conform according to specifications.Based on the review of similar events, this is a known issue that is traced back to design failure.In particular, wall thickness and conicity are identified as the two main root causes.The wall thickness is small compared to other similar aortic root cannulea and then the tip is more likely to kink during the application.The conicity in the complained tip is constant along the tip while other tips of similar aortic root are characterized by an increase of conicity towards the distal extremity that enhances the smooth insertion within the aortic wall.To prevent reoccurrence wall thickness and conicity on the external surface of the tip of the cannula was increased.The complained unit was manufactured before the above described corrective action.The risk is in the acceptable region.No specific action was currently deemed necessary.Livanova will keep monitoring the market.
|
|
Event Description
|
See initial report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|