• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION VERCISE CARTESIA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION VERCISE CARTESIA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS Back to Search Results
Model Number DB-2202-45
Device Problem Low impedance (2285)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: dbs-extension, upn: (b)(4), model: nm-3138-55, serial: (b)(6), batch: 7058794.Product family: dbs-ipg-r-mri, upn: (b)(4), model: db-1200-s, serial: (b)(6), batch: 739156.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patients deep brain stimulation (dbs) right lead exhibited low impedances.At the start of the case, it was unknown whether the issue was the lead, lead extension, or the implantable pulse generator (ipg).The patient underwent a revision procedure.The physician removed the existing lead from the extension and tested the lead by itself using the operation room (or) cable, which confirmed that the lead had low impedances.When the physician tried to remove the lead extension from the ipg site, the screw would not back out.The physician then cut the lead extension and removed the ipg.The lead extension was able to be pulled out of the ipg.The physician decided to replace the ipg and the lead.The physician decided to also explant the existing lead extension and tunnel two new extensions.The procedure went smoothly and was successful.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned lead db-2202-45, sn (b)(6) was analyzed and visual inspection revealed that the proximal array is bent/fractured between contacts 4 and 5.It appears that the lead became damaged during the proximal ends insertion into the lead extension.Crosstalk test confirmed that electrodes 3 and 5 are electrically shorted.The proximal array damage resulted in the reported complaint of low impedances.The returned ipg db-1200-s, sn (b)(6) was analyzed and visual inspection revealed that the septum on port c of the ipg was torn.After removing the septum from port c, it was observed that the setscrew had excessive foreign material.This would prevent the hex wrench from tightening or untightening the setscrew.The returned lead extension nm-3138-55, sn (b)(6) was analyzed and the reported event could not be confirmed with testing of the product return.However, visual inspection revealed that the lead was cleanly cut into two pieces approximately 5 cm from the proximal end of the lead.The clean-cut damage is a result of a typical explant procedure, and it is not considered a failure.Electrical test could not be performed due to the cut lead body.No other anomalies were identified on the returned portion of the lead.A labeling review of the lead was performed, and it did not reveal any anomalies as the instructions for use (ifu) states to take care not to bend or kink the proximal lead array, the stiff portion of the lead body adjacent to the array, or the lead extension connector during insertion.A labeling review of the ipg was performed and the ifu states that the torque wrench should be passed through the slit in the septum located on the side of the ipg header.Additionally, it states that the set screw should be tightened in the ipg header until the torque wrench clicks, indicating that the set screw is fully secured.The torque wrench is torque limiting so that the set screw cannot be overtightened.Only the wrench provided should be used, as other tools may overtighten the set screw and damage the lead extension.There is no evidence that the lead extension was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications/ifu, therefore a labelling review was not performed.The reported event of low impedances and the set screw not backing out was confirmed through technical analysis of the lead and the ipg.It appears that the lead became damaged during the proximal ends insertion into the lead extension, and the proximal array damage resulted in the reported complaint of low impedances.Visual inspection of the ipg revealed that the septum on port c of the ipg was torn.After removing the septum from port c, it was observed that the set screw had excessive foreign material.This would prevent the hex wrench from tightening or untightening the set screw.Visual inspection of the lead extension revealed that the lead extension was cleanly cut into two pieces approximately 5 cm from the proximal end of the lead.No anomalies were identified on the lead extension aside from the clean-cut.The clean-cut damage to the lead extension is a result of a typical explant procedure and it is not considered a failure.The electrical test could not be performed due to the cut lead body.No other anomalies were identified on the returned portion of the lead aside from the clean-cut.The cause of the complaint is due to the associated ipg.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patients deep brain stimulation (dbs) right lead exhibited low impedances.At the start of the case, it was unknown whether the issue was the lead, lead extension, or the implantable pulse generator (ipg).The patient underwent a revision procedure.The physician removed the existing lead from the extension and tested the lead by itself using the operation room (or) cable, which confirmed that the lead had low impedances.When the physician tried to remove the lead extension from the ipg site, the screw would not back out.The physician then cut the lead extension and removed the ipg.The lead extension was able to be pulled out of the ipg.The physician decided to replace the ipg and the lead.The physician decided to also explant the existing lead extension and tunnel two new extensions.The procedure went smoothly and was successful.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERCISE CARTESIA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
road 698, lot no. 12
dorado PR 00646 -260
*   00646-2602
Manufacturer Contact
erik sherburne
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
7632920920
MDR Report Key16924140
MDR Text Key315171601
Report Number3006630150-2023-02719
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NHL
UDI-Device Identifier08714729905288
UDI-Public08714729905288
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/15/2021
Device Model NumberDB-2202-45
Device Catalogue NumberDB-2202-45
Device Lot Number7051198
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/20/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/12/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/22/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-