It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in left iliac artery via right femoral artery retrograde approach, when the device was used to aspirate thrombus over about one-centimeter, harsh sounds were allegedly heard.It was further reported that after progressive aspiration the tip of the catheter was allegedly found to be fused when the catheter was delivered to the distal end of the lesion and retracted for continuous aspiration.Reportedly the tip of the catheter was retracted into the sheath for removal from the body and no detached component or device left in the patient.The patient was sent back to the ward for continuous thrombolytic therapy.There was no reported patient injury.
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos and a video were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3: device not returned.
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in left iliac artery via right femoral artery retrograde approach, when the device was used to aspirate thrombus over about one-centimeter, harsh sounds were allegedly heard.It was further reported that after progressive aspiration the tip of the catheter was allegedly found to be fused when the catheter was delivered to the distal end of the lesion and retracted for continuous aspiration.Reportedly the tip of the catheter was retracted into the sheath for removal from the body and no detached component or device left in the patient.The patient was sent back to the ward for continuous thrombolytic therapy.There was no reported patient injury.
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was not returned for evaluation and a physical investigation is not possible.The user report contains information regarding catheter malfunction.The images of the catheter provided by the user show deformed tip of the catheter, melted tube.This type of malfunction happens due to restricted flow, too fast catheter movement and heating up of the catheter tip.The reported malfunction, catheter deformation due to mechanical jam can be confirmed.A clear root cause could not be identified but a blockage of the catheter represents a known inherent risk.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10 : g3, h6 (device, method) h11: h6 (result, conclusion) h11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|