H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
It was reported through the litigation process that eighteen years three months and twenty-three days, post filter placement, a computed tomography revealed that the inferior vena cava filter tilted, detached and strut embedded in wall of the inferior vena cava and migrated to heart and right pulmonary artery.The filter was attempted for retrieval which took more than twice the normal amount of time expected for retrieval of an ivc filter.The filter and the three broken legs were able to be retrieved; however, one of the feet from a strut was still retained in the extravascular soft tissue and was unable to be removed.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|