• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KARL STORZ SE & CO. KG C-MAC VIDEOLARYNG. D-BLADE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KARL STORZ SE & CO. KG C-MAC VIDEOLARYNG. D-BLADE Back to Search Results
Model Number 8401HX
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Unspecified Respiratory Problem (4464)
Event Date 12/15/2020
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Belated evaluation and reporting of this complaint was done during retrospective review as part of capa 20-0052 corrective action 6.The 8401hx c-mac® video laryngoscope d-blade was sent to karl storz on 23rd december 2020 for investigation.Upon investigation it can be confirmed that the c mac blade was defective.The covering glass and the lens are missing.The bad image quality, as reported, during the procedure is most likely caused by a defective camera and/or residues present at the interfaces.As per confirmation by the hospital, the d-blade used was defective before the procedure, however the user/nurses did not remove the defective blade from the holder and also the user did not check the function of the device before use.As a consequence, the defective device was then used and caused a bad quality image during the procedure.The root cause is most likely due to user error to use the defective device and not check its function prior to its use.In the corresponding ifu 96076011en-us, v3.1 11/2019 below chapter 5.1 the user must to perform a visual and functional test before and after every use.Risk level and probability are still adequate.The event is filed under internal karl storz complaint id (200843848).
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was event with a c-mac videolaryngoscope d-blade.According to the information received, the patient had a difficult airway.After extubation it ended up in a situation where re-intubation was needed.It was tried to intubate with a d-blade and discovered that the picture on the monitor was blurry.The intubation did not succeed despite several attempts.Another cmac was fetched from the surgery department.At the same time an emergency tracheostomy was performed.The patient was revived for 30 minutes - the patient died.The bad visibility with the cmac caused extra confusion in an already challenging situation.Immediately afterwards the cmac situation was investigated.The monitor (hosp.Number (b)(6)) had been taken to the medical technology department the day before (b)(6) in order to be fixed due to bad picture quality.Earlier during the day of the event (before the emergency airway situation) the monitor had been returned to the nurse station´s desk without any written description of the repairs performed.The monitor was returned to its holder (it was assumed the monitor was fixed).After the situation and several phone calls it became clear that the medical technology department had found the monitor to be fully functional and that the problem is most obviously with the blade.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
C-MAC VIDEOLARYNG. D-BLADE
Type of Device
C-MAC VIDEOLARYNG. D-BLADE
Manufacturer (Section D)
KARL STORZ SE & CO. KG
dr.-karl-storz-strasse 34
tuttlingen, 78532
GM  78532
Manufacturer (Section G)
KARL STORZ SE & CO. KG
dr.-karl-storz-strasse 34
tuttlingen, 78532
GM   78532
Manufacturer Contact
anja fair
2151 e grand ave
el segundo, CA 90245
MDR Report Key16950085
MDR Text Key315425746
Report Number9610617-2023-00602
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number8401HX
Device Catalogue Number8401HX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/23/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/16/2020
Initial Date FDA Received05/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/19/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-