Note: this report pertains to a spyscope ds ii access & delivery catheters and spyglass ds - digital controller that were used in the same patient and procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that spyscope ds ii access & delivery catheter was used during an electrohydraulic lithotripsy (ehl) procedure performed (b)(6) 2023.During the procedure, the image on the screen disappeared while crushing the stone and treatment could not be continued, therefore procedure was rescheduled.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
Note: this report pertains to a spyscope ds ii access & delivery catheters and spyglass ds - digital controller that were used in the same patient and procedure.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that spyscope ds ii access & delivery catheter was used during an electrohydraulic lithotripsy (ehl) procedure performed (b)(6) 2023.During the procedure, the image on the screen disappeared while crushing the stone and treatment could not be continued, therefore procedure was rescheduled.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the lot number; therefore, the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.Block h6: imdrf impact code f1001 is being used to capture the reportable event of aborted/cancelled procedure.Block h10: investigation results: the returned spyscope ds ii was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that there were elevator marks were noted on the shaft of the catheter.Witness marks were observed on the contacts of the umbilicus connector, indicating it was connected to a controller.An image assessment for visualization was performed.The device was plugged into the controller.A live, clear image was displayed.No problems were observed with physical connectivity of the device.The umbilicus connector was visually inspected and no damage or defects were noted.The device was fully articulated in all directions; no problems were identified with the image.X-ray imaging of the distal tip showed no problems with the redistribution layer (rdl) or thru-silicon vias (tsvs).X-ray imaging of the handle showed no problems with the printed circuit board assembly (pcba) or camera wires.The handle was opened and the components within were visually inspected.It was noted that there was procedural residue on the pofs and camera wire in the breakout region, indicated procedural fluids had flowed back up the optics lumen into the handle during use.The tip was blocked and saline was flushed through the irrigation tubing to induce backflow of saline into the optics lumen.This caused the image to be disrupted, with blue/orange lines across the screen and a purple hue, leading to a full loss of image.The saline was drained from the optics lumen and the image was restored.The reported complaint was confirmed.During product analysis, it was noted that procedural residue remained at the top of the optics lumen in the breakout.The optics lumen was filled with saline and the image was disrupted.Draining the optics lumen resulted in the restoration of the image.The image signal does not withstand the change in capacitance created by the introduction of saline into the optics lumen, and procedural factors can cause this fluid to enter the optics lumen during use.Based on all gathered information, the probable root cause selected for the image failure due to fluid in the optics lumen is cause traced to device design, which indicates that the problems are traced to the design specifications.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|