• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Model Number 74123152
Device Problems Biocompatibility (2886); Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Patient Problems Osteolysis (2377); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 10/13/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, after undergoing right hip bhr resurfacing on (b)(6) 2015, the patient experienced pain, osteolysis and femoral component loosening.Subsequently on (b)(6) 2017, elevated metal levels in blood were found (cobalt = 12.2 g/l, chromium = 9.8 g/l).These events were treated by performing a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2020, in which the femoral head was explanted, and the cup was retained.A smith+nephew tha system was placed, composed by a synergy stem, an oxinium femoral head and a bhr dual mobility insert.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B2: outcomes attributed to adverse event ,d10: concomitant medical products and therapy dates ,g5:pma/510(k) # and h6: health effect - impact code and medical device problem code.Section h3, h6:it was reported that a right hip revision surgery was performed due to pain, osteolysis, femoral component loosening and elevated metal levels in blood.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the devices concerned was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the head, and this failure will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.The reported pain, osteolysis, femoral component loosening, elevated cobalt and chromium levels and noted intraoperative findings of metallosis may be consistent with findings associated with an adverse reaction to metal debris.However, the clinical root cause of the reported clinical symptoms cannot be confirmed and it cannot be concluded that the reported reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.H6: health effect - clinical code.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 52MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key16965412
MDR Text Key315667818
Report Number3005975929-2023-00092
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010552433
UDI-Public03596010552433
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/01/2020
Device Model Number74123152
Device Catalogue Number74123152
Device Lot Number15DW12249
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/25/2023
Initial Date FDA Received05/19/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/08/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/03/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ACETABULAR CUP HAP SIZE 52/60, LOT#:14JW08276; MEDICATIONS:1. CARDIZEM2. NAPROXEN
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-