Investigation: a review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures,and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Surgeon, x-ray, information analysis: on (b)(6) 2023 apifix was notified that the patient #308 is scheduled for implant removal on (b)(6) 2023.The patient reportedly hears a metallic sound coming from her back. on (b)(6) 2023 apifix was further notified that on (b)(6) 2023 the patient's implant was removed due to a ratchet mechanism failure.Coorective action: ratchet malfunction (resulting in a backup of the distraction) can result from physical trauma, practicing high-demand sports, and tissue growth inside the ratchet mechanism.Ratchet malfunction may be a coincidental finding and may also be reported together with pain/curve progression/noise.The company took several actions to mitigate ratchet malfunction: eco-13, the ratchet flat spring component was changed to a thicker spring (from 0.15 to 0.25mm).Eco-59, addition of a stopper pin to prevent the pole from dislocating from the base and inherit from the design to prevent the collapse of the ratchet.In march 2020, a highlight of the risk associated with practicing high-demand sports was added to the mid-c training presentation.The company continues to monitor the effectiveness of the mitigations.Risk assessment: reoperation events are a known risk that was assessed and recorded by the product risk assessment dms-777 rev r this complaint does not change the occurrences rate.The risk of the ratchet malfunction has been assessed and found to be acceptable (dms#777 rev q1 hazard id 1.6).The total rate of ratchet malfunction for any reason is 1.60% the risks have been quantified, characterized, and documented as acceptable within full risk assessment.Upon return of the implant a failure analysis will be conducted.When further relevant information is identified with which to determine a cause, a supplemental report will be filed.
|