|
Model Number LXMC17 |
Device Problems
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883); Inflammation (1932)
|
Event Date 03/29/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient is experiencing recurrent symptoms of heartburn.There was a positive ph bravo.The implant date was (b)(6) 2018.The explant took place on (b)(6) 2023.Egd was performed on (b)(6) 2023 la grade esophagitis, bravo (b)(6) 2023 positive 33.7, veg (b)(6) 2022.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/22/2023.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what is the lot number for the linx device? was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? after implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/6/2023.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is the lot number for the linx device? n/a.Was ph testing performed prior to explant to confirm recurrent reflux? yes, as stated in the complaint a positive ph bravo on (b)(6) with a 33.7 after implant, was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? yes.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/26/2023.Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|