It was reported through the litigation process that nine years two months and nineteen days post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter had tilted, detached and penetrated the wall of the inferior vena cava.The device has been removed successfully.The detached filter strut was embedded in a bone spur near the spine has not been removed after an attempted but unsuccessful removal procedure.Another strut was lodged in the thorax outside the vascular system and patient's heart was injured during the attempt to remove the fragment, causing bleeding in the pericardial sack of the heart.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Device not returned.
|